Systematic Theology

Writing a Fundamental and Biblical Systematic Theology for the 21st Century REGISTER to comment at

Part 11 Eschatology

A Systematic Theology for the 21st Century

Part 11 Eschatology

Download pdf at

Table of Contents

Part 11 Eschatology – The Doctrine of Last Things 3

God’s Seven Dispensations Outlined 6

The First Dispensation – Innocence 6

The Second Dispensation – Conscience 7

The Third Dispensation – Government 7

The Fourth Dispensation – Promise 8

The Fifth Dispensation – Law 9

The Sixth Dispensation – Grace and Truth 11

The Seventh Dispensation – The Kingdom 12

The Facts and Flaws of Supersessionism 13

Supersessionism Defined 13

Supersessionism Refuted 14

Replacement Theology and Amillenianism 20

The Premillennial Return of Christ 21

The Pretribulation Rapture of the Church 23

Cambron’s Chapter 9 Eschatology – The Doctrine of Last Things 23














Critique of other Systematic Theology Eschatology Works 50

Critique of John Miley’s 1892 Methodist Eschatology 50

Critique of Charles Hodge’s 1878 Eschatology 50

Critique of Augustus Strong’s 1907 Eschatology 50

Critique of Theisens’ 1949 Eschatology 50

Critique of Chafer’s 1948 Eschatology 50

Critique of Chafer’s Volume IV Ecclesiology and Eschatology Introduction 50

A Critique of Dr. Chafer’s Ecclesiology 52

Chafer’s Systematic Error 52

A Critique of Dr. Chafer’s Eschatology 56

Critique of Geisler’s 2002 Eschatology 65

Penny Pulpit Essays on Eschatology. 66

Msg #1342 Prophetic Truth and Accuracy 66

Msg #1440 Don’t Be Left Behind 66

Msg #1441 The 7 Year Tribulation is not Allegorical! 67

Part 12 Epilogue 68

Bibliography for Theology 69


Part 11 Eschatology – The Doctrine of Last Things

“When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes” (Matthew 24:15-18).

Eschatology is the study of last things. Coming from the Greek, “But many that are first shall be last (escatos – eschatos) and the last (escatos – eschatos) first” (Mark 10:31), and “ology”1, a word, a discourse, a doctrine, a teaching. Their is no greater testimony of intimate friendship than one revealing all their future plans and aspirations to their friend. Jesus said it this way, “ Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you” (John 15:15). The Lord Jesus Christ materialized this intimacy in the Revelation of Jesus Christ, and only those on an intimate basis with Christ can read its pages with an ear to hear.2 Consequentially, what one grasps in the study of eschatology is a good indicator of their standing in the intimacy of the Lord Jesus Christ. Christendom, on a whole has failed this test of intimacy, and the Catholic Church, whether Roman or Reformed, is herein shown to be apostate.

When our Lord Jesus Christ gave his Apostle John his Revelation he commanded, “Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter” (Rev 1:19). The latter of these three is eschatology. The first is of course what John wrote in his gospel record and in his three epistles, i.e. “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it…)” (1John 1:1-2a). That constitutes, for the Apostle John, “The things which thou hast seen.”

“The things which are,” were written by the Apostle John when he wrote the seven messages to the seven churches. When John, the last living Apostle wrote in the end of the first century A.D. the “things which are” consisted of the local independent autonomous churches. The fact that there ware seven messages to seven churches emphasizes both independence and completeness. Ergo the church is not “catholic” and the time period for the present age, i.e. the church age, is displayed in its completeness. Thus the first chapter of Revelation is relegated to Jesus’ first category, “The things that thou hast seen;” the second and third chapters are relegated to “the things which are,” and chapters four through twenty two are the eschatology that is to be examined in this volume.

Before correlating those nineteen chapters of the Revelation of Jesus Christ with the doctrine of the last things, it needs to be said that the seven messages to the seven churches correlates to the church history that we have seen transpire in the last two thousand years. That is not coincidence and a thorough exposition of that correlation can be found in our ecclesiology in volume nine of this work.

The real key in understanding what Christ has revealed in the last nineteen chapters of his revelation, i.e. eschatology, only comes when one understands that God works with man in seven distinct dispensations. Christ gives to the Apostle John three distinct time divisions to write down. When John wrote “what he had seen,” i.e. Jesus before his ascension, he recorded the transition period between the dispensation of law and the dispensation of grace. When he recorded “the things which are,” i.e. the seven messages to the seven churches (Rev 2-3), he wrote about the dispensation of grace. When the Apostle John wrote “the things which shall be hereafter” he recorded the transition period after the dispensation of grace and before the dispensation of the kingdom (Rev 4-19), then the kingdom (Rev 20), and then the new heaven and the new earth (Rev 21-22). If one does not rightly divide God’s seven dispensations they cannot rightly divide the word of truth, and they certainly cannot construct a Biblical eschatology. And if one does not clearly distinguish and delineate the seven year transition period between grace and kingdom, the period where the seven sealed book of judgment is being unsealed, trumpeted, and then vialed out, the period where the 144 thousand Jews are the gospel witnesses because the church has been raptured out, well then there will be great confusion throughout every aspect of their eschatology. It is quite like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, wherein we put the frame together first.

Thus, in this introduction to a Biblical eschatology, we need to clearly outline the seven dispensations and review the transition periods between each. We also need to examine the Covenant Theology and Replacement Theology which keeps Roman Catholicism and Protestant Reformers from the truth of dispensationalism. One can safely say that all of “Christendom” is pursuing this false teaching. The Roman Church conceived it, John Calvin constructed it, the Protestant Church pursued it, and Reformed Theology embraces it. Ergo every denomination of Christianity is tainted by Covenant Theology. Further every false cult of Christianity sprang from this wild root of apostate error. Consequently, this introduction will also briefly survey some of the foolish gangling that comes from Covenant Theology.

God’s Seven Dispensations Outlined

An understanding of dispensations is best introduced starting in the book of Genesis. So is an understanding of God, understanding of man, and understanding of redemption. But presuming some understanding of those three, let us focus on the very first dispensation, which is often called “Innocence.”

The First Dispensation – Innocence

God placed man in the Garden of Eden with a specific requirement of obedience. He was left in that testing for a period of time to “see” how he would fare. He fared poorly, and was consequently removed from the Garden. There were consequences for his failure and that period of testing, for all mankind, was abruptly ended. Now a new set of guidelines must be determined, a new testing of mankind would be pursued.

In that scenario there is a general set of guidelines which define a dispensation (Greek – oikonomiaoikonomia translated in English “dispensation,” four times and “stewardship,” three times). It is defined in the lexicon, the management, oversight, or administration of a household or of other property- usually owned by another. A dispensation contains 1) a set of rules, guidelines or expectations given by God, 2) a period of time wherein man is tried or tested under the guidelines, and 3) a distinct ending of the testing period wherein (it shall be seen as the pattern develops) man fails to live up to the guideline. The word dispensation is used four times in the Holy Bible (1Cor 9:17, Eph 1:10, 3:2, and Col 1:25). Additionally it is translated stewardship three times (Luke 16:2, 3, 4). The understanding of stewardship might better refine what a dispensation is because as a steward one is left in charge of what belongs to another, there is a period of time where they are accountable, and there is a definite ending wherein “the Lord of the vineyard” returns (cf Matt 21:33-46). The first dispensation, innocence in the Garden of Eden, illustrates well these three concepts of a dispensation.

The Second Dispensation – Conscience

What were the rules after man was removed from the Garden of Eden? C.I. Scofield labeled the second dispensation “Conscience.” Therein man did what was right in his own mind. In the dispensation of conscience the first born man became the first first-degree murderer. Note particularly in that murder report that man was not to take vengeance or retribution on Cain for his act of murder. Instead man had to answer for himself before a Holy God. Note also that a blood sacrifice was required in this age of conscience. Even if the learned scholar cannot find it in Genesis chapter four, the Bible believer knows the principle well from Hebrews 9:22, “And almost all things are by law purged with blood; and without the shedding of blood is no remission (of sin).”

How did this dispensation of conscience end? “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart” (Gen 6:5-6). The flood brought the second dispensation to an expedient end. A new dispensation would now begin.

The Third Dispensation – Government

When man’s conscience before God was unable to keep him from evil, God installed a dispensation wherein man was accountable to man to curb him from evil. C.I. Scofield labeled the third dispensation “Government.” Human government has three primary responsibilities in this endeavor, 1) to promote the good, 2) to punish the bad, and 3) to protect the innocent. It is intended to keep a restraint on man’s depravity, iniquity and evil. It finds its root and basis in God’s command, “And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man” (Gen 9:5-6). Of course much more could be said about this dispensation, but consider that it did have other provisions, like shortened life spans, the eating of meat, and its tower of Babble consequence (Gen 6:3, 9:3, 11:3). Note also that this dispensation did not formally end, it just got dispersed to all the nations of the world when they dispersed with confounded languages. In that sense the role and principles of human government continue until today. Anyone can see its initial, and then repeated failures on man’s part. In any event there was a failure of government to restrain man’s evil and God moves on to a new trial for man.

The Fourth Dispensation – Promise

With the failure of nations in curbing man from iniquity God chooses to construct one particular and peculiar nation and calls Abram as the father of this chosen nation. He gives Abram profound promises and Abram believes God. C.I. Scofield labeled the fourth dispensation “Promise.” Much more could be said about this dispensation of promise but suffice it to say some of the promises were unconditional and are yet to be fulfilled, i.e. Israel will occupy all of the promised land in peace and safety. The dispensation closes with the seed of Abraham still holding the promises. They have divided into twelve tribes of Israel (previously named Jacob), but they are in bondage in Egypt.

Dispensations are divinely ordered stewardships by which God reveals himself, reveals man’s depravity, and reveals his longsuffering. It becomes increasingly apparent that every stewardship testing of man ends in man’s failure. The fact that there are seven such stewardship tests emphasizes that God is giving man every opportunity to do right. Yet each dispensation ends in the abject failure of man. Of all the failed dispensations, the failure under this one may have been more providentially driven than depravity driven, but it still depicts a failure. The failed innocence dispensation brought death, conscience – flood, government – babble, promise – bondage. In the fifth dispensation God would lay down the law for his chosen nation.

The Fifth Dispensation – Law

The promised seed of Abraham, which were to inherit God’s promised land, were redeemed from bondage in Egypt and read the Law of God by God himself. This began the dispensation called Law. The children of Israel agreed to obey all the laws of God. God agreed to bless them and give them all the promised land if they did. A quick read through the book of Judges confirms that they did not, and thus he did not.

It needs to be clarified that the law was only given to the promised seed of Abraham, i.e. the twelve tribes of Israel. It was not given to Gentile nations. It was not given as a model law for Gentile nations to pattern their laws after, and it was not given as a model law for the Christians, or the pious, or the religious. It was given to keep Israel a holy and a peculiar people in all the earth (Exo 19:5, Deut 14:2, 26:18, Psalm 135:4). The severe penalties of death by stoning were given so that this holy, peculiar people could “put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear” (Deut 21:21, cf 17:17, 19:19, 22:21, 24:7).

Consternation is dolled out to Christians who do not understand the dispensations, this dispensation or this purpose of the law. First because many religionists and “Clergy3 construct some form of works salvation where they pick a few choice laws and disregard others. Second because Christians themselves are confused and troubled about God having a man stoned because he picked up sticks on a Sabbath (Num 15:32-36). And third because the world mocks the Christian because he does not know how to explain the conflict between law and grace. Such consternation is relieved when one understands the realities of the dispensation of law. It is for Israel’s peculiarity and for Gentiles learning (Gal 3:24-25).

Although the law, given to God’s chosen nation Israel, is not set as a model for other nations to follow there are many moral principles and civil laws which are exemplary models for other Gentile nations. Many of our US laws are based on God’s laws for Israel. Our Creator’s requirements for moral right and wrong are discernible. Criminal laws for murder and manslaughter, civil laws for stealing, property damage and restitution can certainly find a place in our legal systems. But the death penalty punishments and the eye for an eye consideration must be left in their context for the dispensation of law. All of Israel’s dietary laws, ceremonial laws, and other laws designed to keep Israel a peculiar people must be kept in their proper context, in order to rightly divide the Word of Truth.

And so Israel was given a myriad of laws to keep her a holy people, a peculiar people, and a chosen nation of God. She remained only the latter of those three and after her chastisements only one tribe remained. The Hebrews are now called Jews, because the only tribe left in Israel at the coming of her Messiah was Judah. The only begotten Son of God came as the Lion of the tribe of Judah, to be the king of the Jews. But after being under law for fifteen hundred years (BC 1492 – 30 AD) the lawyers, scribes and Pharisees of the Jews rejected their king. Indeed they had the Romans crucify him under their laws. Although the Jews rejected Jesus as their Messiah and King, their King did not reject them. The promise of God is emphatic, the Christ will sit on the throne of David and rule and reign the twelve tribes of Israel as he said. But after they rejected him as their king, he goes to the Gentiles, and temporarily the Gentiles become his people. That makes for a separate and distinct dispensation, the dispensation of grace, the age of the church.

The Sixth Dispensation – Grace and Truth

Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof” (Matt 21:43)…. “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17).

In the sixth dispensation the promises that were made to the Jews are temporarily set aside and God’s grace was extended to all people. “For by grace are ye saved through faith” (Eph 2:8a) is the hallmark of this dispensation. The salvation available in this dispensation differs from any other: individual’s are Converted – Justified – Quickened – Indwelt – and Immersed-in-Christ. They are consequently sealed by the Holy Spirit of God and that new-birth, salvation, conversion, cannot be undone. It has been said, “In the Old Testament God made a temple for the people, in the New Testament God makes a people for his temple. A whole volume of this systematic theology deals with soteriology. Suffice it to say here that it has never been easier for man to be in a right relationship with his Creator, Jehovah God, and yet this dispensation of Grace and Truth (John 1:17) is destined to end “as it was in the days of Noe,… as it was in the days of Lot…” (Luke 17:26, 28).

The dispensation of grace will come to an end, and it will end in a failure of mankind. It is a failure to accept God’s simple plan of salvation (Heb 2:3). The ending of the sixth dispensation and the beginning of the seventh and final dispensation is really the beginning of a Biblical eschatology. The doctrine of last things includes the closing of the Church age, or the dispensation of Grace and Truth, and the ushering in of the last dispensation.

The Seventh Dispensation – The Kingdom

And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end (Luke 1:31-33). And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever (Rev 11:15). And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS (Rev 19:16).

It has been resoundingly promised that the Jewish Messiah (Greek Christ) would be the King of the Jews, i.e. the King of Israel, who sits on the throne of David. That fact is hated by Satan and refuted with tenacity by the Roman Church. The despise of that fact has freely flowed into the doctrine of the Roman reformers. The persistence of the denial has caused the rejection of all dispensational teaching in the wide gate and broad path of Christendom. That broad path is called “supersessionism” and it is unfortunate that so many Baptists are ignorant of its devices.

A study of Biblical eschatology will center on the fact that this kingdom will be ushered in at the second advent of Christ. It will last for the thousand years that Christ promised in Revelation chapter twenty, so it is called the “Millennial Kingdom.” It will be preceded by a judgment of the nations which will end “the times of the Gentiles” (Luk 21:24) and be called the seven year tribulation and the seventieth week of Daniel (Dan 9:24). This Great Tribulation has 144 thousand, from the twelve tribes of Israel, preaching the gospel, not the church. The Church is removed in a pretribulation rapture, else they would be in competition with the 144 thousand Jews. Again the whole key to understanding “the things which shall be hereafter” requires that one believe in the Millennial Reign of Christ as the seventh dispensation of the Holy Bible.

But even the Kingdom age, where Christ physically rules and reigns over the whole world, ends with an insurrection . That insurgence is short lived and mankind steps off into eternity and streets of gold. This short survey of the seven dispensations builds the framework for the last things. Christendom’s many misunderstandings of the end times come from those who have rejected dispensationalism and embraced supersessionism, i.e. Replacement Theology.

The Facts and Flaws of Supersessionism

The denial of the Bible’s dispensational teachings started with the Roman Church. After the annihilation of the Jews, and Jerusalem in 70 AD. Catholic Church Fathers Saint Clement of Alexandria (150 – 215 AD), and his student Saint Origen of Alexandria (184 – 253 AD) supposed that Judaism was gone forever, and supposed that the Church (they supposed it to be catholic) should thus absorb all the promises given to the Jews. Given that the Bible clearly promised the regathering of Israel, and their inheriting the Promised Land, this would have been an impossible task, but Saint Origen, known as the Father of the Allegorical Method, found a way to dismiss any literal rendering of Scripture whenever it pleased “the Catholic Church.” Consequently the allegorical method of hermeneutics has been the mainstay of the Roman Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformers to this day.

Supersessionism Defined

A reasonable summary of supersessionism is expressed by the neo-evangelicals who spend their days tip-toeing around it and pretending that it is not so bad:

Replacement theology or supersessionism is not a ‘one size fits all’ perspective. There are variations within this view. Punitive supersessionism emphasizes Israel’s disobedience as the reason for its displacement as the people of God. Economic supersessionism emphasizes that national Israel’s role as the people of God expired with the coming of the New Testament church. Structural supersessionism is an approach to the canon that minimizes the role of the Hebrew scriptures. Within supersessionism strong and mild forms are discernible. Strong supersessionism does not believe in a future salvation or restoration of Israel. Mild supersessionism believes in a salvation of the nation Israel but no restoration to a place of prominence.4

Supersessionism Refuted

A thorough refutation of supersessionism is found in an article by James Showers, “The Facts And Flaws of Covenant Theology.”5 The outline of that article is represented in the thesis below.

The Facts and Flaws of Covenant Theology

  1. Covenant Theology is the dominant theological system of most mainline Protestant churches.
  2. It is a system of theology that interprets the Bible’s philosophy of history through the lens of two or three covenants.
    1. Covenant of Works (in the Garden of Eden)
    2. Covenant of Redemption and/or Grace (After the Garden of Eden)
  3. It is founded on Replacement Theology, which:
    1. maintains that God has replaced the Jewish people with the church
    2. and maintains that Christians are now God’s chosen people.
  4. John Calvin was a Covenant Theologian, dogmatic that:
    1. Christians are now the elect of God,
    2. Israel is no longer the elect of God,
    3. Individual Christians are chosen for salvation before the foundation of the world.
  5. It is a very dangerous Catholic and Protestant Theology
  6. Calvinism’s Dogma on Covenant Theology shows in the Presbyterian Church

Info from Friends of Israel, article by James Showers accessed 9/9/2016

  1. Calvinism’s Dogma on Covenant Theology shows in his Presbyterian Church
    1. The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) began a “phased, selective divestment” from American corporations operating in Israel beginning in 2004. Charges of antisemitism caused the General Assembly to drop it in 2006.
    2. In June 2014 The Presbyterian Church USA (PCUSA) considered banning the word “Israel” from its prayers. Amid charges of antisemitism it was ultimately rejected by the 221st General Assembly
    3. In June 2016 Presbyterian Church USA’s General Assembly Assails Israel and Abandons Christians in Middle East. Shows an obsession with Israel, and a disregard for Muslim slaughter of Christians
    4. The Church sponsored Israel-Palestine Mission Network (IPMN) has a long history of broadcasting anti-Zionist and antisemitic propaganda. The leader states that Israeli soldiers “are not human beings.”
    5. PCUSA passed several resolutions aimed to pressure Israel to leave territories it has occupied since its 1967 war with neighboring states.
    6. Presbyterian Church USA delegates angered mainstream Jewish groups, the measures unfairly “demonize” Israel, give a pass to Palestinian violence and question the Jewish state’s right to exist.
  1. The Flaws of Covenant Theology
    1. It only explains God’s supposed purpose for elect man and does not touch other programs God is carrying out in history.
      1. What about the Covenant with Abraham? With Israel? Of Law?
      2. What about the New Covenant in Christ’s blood?
      3. What about his Second Coming and Millennial Reign? And his promised Restoration of Israel?
      4. the unifying principle of Covenant Theology is too narrow. It deals solely with man’s redemption; it does not include God’s plan for the redemption of all creation. Nor does it provide enough answers for what God is doing here on Earth.
    2. It ultimately focuses on man, not on God. A hermeneutic that spiritualizes the words of Scripture, reinterpreting the literal into something figurative, it is a platform for humanism. Liberal, modernist movements flourish in mainline Protestant, Covenant churches.
    3. Another of Covenant Theology’s serious flaws is that it denies the distinction between Israel and the church.
  1. Covenant Theology denies the distinction between Israel and the church.
    1. The church, they suppose, begins with Abraham (Gen. 12), rather than in Acts 2;
      1. Old Testament Israel no longer refers to the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
      2. Old Testament Israel is redefined as the covenant people, the people of faith in the Old Testament.
      3. No longer is it physical descent that makes one an Israelite; it is faith in God.
    2. Covenant Theology uses two methods to interpret Scripture:
      1. 1) the historical-grammatical-literal method when it suits them, and
      2. 2) an allegorical-spiritual one that enables them to redefine Israel and make it the church, rather than the Jewish people.
    3. They change the Millennial Kingdom from a literal, future 1,000-year period into the current Church Age via Amillennialism or Postmillennialism
    4. They deny the Rapture of the Church
  1. Covenant Theology is built on Replacement Theology.
    1. to remove Replacement Theology from Covenant Theology would collapse the entire system.
    2. Covenant theologians deny that God has two distinct programs, one for Israel and one for the church.
    3. Covenant theologians refuse to define the church as beginning in Acts 2, with Israel being a separate entity.
    4. Further, they deny a literal, future Tribulation and the Millennium.
    5. To accept these truths would turn them into dispensationalists.
    6. It is important to be a Biblical Dispensationalist, and know the seven dispensations of God found in the Holy Bible.
      1. Innocency Gen 1:28
      2. Conscience Gen 3:23
      3. Human Government Gen 8:20
      4. Promise Gen 12:1
      5. Law Exod 19:8
      6. Grace John 1:17. Eph 3:1-6
      7. Kingdom Eph 1:10, Rev 20
    7. Also EIGHT Distinct Covenants
      1. Edenic Gen 1-3
      2. Adamic Gen 3:15
      3. Noahic Gen 9:1
      4. Abrahamic Gen 15:18
      5. Mosaic Exod 19:25
      6. Palestinian Deut 30:3 (Return to Promised Land)
      7. Davidic 2Sam 7:16
      8. New Heb 8:8
    8. Why Should We Know This?
      1. When was this text written?
      2. To whom was it written?
      3. In what dispensation?
      4. For what purpose?
      5. Law of Context.
      6. Distinction of Truths.
      7. Observance of Great Transitional Divided.
  1. What God’s Word Actually Says
    1. Jesus Christ said, “I will build [future tense] My church” (Mt. 16:18). Christ was looking to a future day when the church would begin.
    2. God’s Word distinguishes between Israel and the church.
    3. Scripture calls Israel the wife of God (Isa. 54:5–6) but calls the church the Bride of Christ (Rev. 21:9; 22:17).
    4. God’s Word says there will be seven years of tribulation following the Rapture of the church. Covenant Theology claims
      1. there is no need for the Tribulation and
      2. no need to restore the nation of Israel and bring it to repentance
      3. because God is finished with Israel.
      4. there also is no reason for God to judge the Gentile nations for their treatment of the Jewish people.
    5. God’s Word promises Christ will rule from His throne for a literal 1,000 years.
      1. vs Amillennialism Augustine developed it about 400 BC as the Roman church began. “A” – “no” i.e. No Millennial Reign of Christ.
      2. vs Postmillennialism. The church will continue until the entire world becomes Christian, and opens the door for Christ to return to take all believers to the new heavens and new earth.
      3. Roman and Protestant theologians are FALSE TEACHERS!
  1. What Replacement Theology Maintains
    1. Replacement Theology maintains that, because the Jewish people rejected Jesus Christ, God has replaced or superseded ethnic Israel with the church* and punished them by rescinding all of the covenant promises He gave them. It also claims:
      1. (1) the church began with Abraham in Genesis 12,
      2. (2) the church is merely a continuation of Old Testament Israel,
      3. (3) the church is true or “spiritual Israel,” and
      4. (4) true Israel in the Old Testament was comprised of Abraham’s spiritual, not physical, descendants.
    2. Replacement theologians also claim we must first understand the New Testament before we can understand the Old. This method enables them to redefine Israel to mean Abraham’s spiritual descendants only.
    3. Replacement Theology also conveniently manages to uncouple God’s covenant promises from His covenant curses.
      1. The church inherits all of the promises to Israel,
      2. but the Jewish people (ethnic Israel) keep all of the covenant curses.
      3. This uncoupling is quite a feat.
    4. Since the Replacement church sees itself as a continuation of Old Testament Israel, it applies portions of Old Testament Law to itself while ignoring important New Testament teachings.
    5. Finally, Replacement Theology teaches there is no future for national Israel:
      1. God has thoroughly rejected Israel and no longer has a place for it in His plan for eternity apart from the salvation of individual Jewish people.
      2. Israel are no longer His Chosen People;
      3. There is no future 70th week of Daniel (see Daniel 9:24–27) or a future, literal, Millennial Kingdom of God on Earth.
    6. Replacement Theology is the historical position of the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches and the common position of the Reformed and Covenant churches.
      1. It has fueled anti-Semitism for 1,800 years.
      2. More anti-Semitic acts have been committed in the name of the church than by all other groups combined.
  1. Replacement Theology Twists Christ’s Words
    1. Using a literal-historical-grammatical method of interpretation, we would expect to find:
      1. Clear, concise statements that God has rejected Israel.
      2. Definitive passages that teach that the church has replaced Israel.
      3. God’s declaration that He has excluded Israel from the Old Testament covenants.
      4. A total lack of New Testament verses that speak of Israel’s future in God’s plan.
    2. Speaking to a Jewish audience, Jesus said, “Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it” (Mt. 21:43). Thus, Replacement theologians say:
      1. (1) God has permanently rejected national Israel, and
      2. (2) the “nation” to whom the Kingdom of God will be given is the church.
    3. Although this passage teaches that Israel will be judged, it concludes by promising a future day when a new generation of national Israel will repent and accept Him as Messiah.
    4. Furthermore, nowhere does Scripture define the church as a “nation.”
    5. Because the Jewish generation alive during His First Coming refused His offer of the restored Kingdom, God would take the Kingdom from them and give it to a future Jewish nation that will accept Him.
  1. Replacement Theology Twists Paul’s Words
    1. The most mis-quoted passage in defense of Replacement Theology is Galatians 6:16: “ And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.” Replacement theologians say “Israel of God” refers to the catholic church.
    2. In the Holy Bible the word Israel refers to national or ethnic Israel, not the body of all believers.
    3. The Jewish believers were kept distinct from the Judaizers.
    4. It does not say the church has replaced Israel, it says that Gentiles are included with Israel.
    5. Replacement theologians also use Galatians 3:7 and 29 to bolster their position: “ Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.” (v. 7). “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (v. 29).
    6. They maintain the words sons of Abraham and Abraham’s seed imply the church has become true Israel,
    7. They concluding that all believers are spiritual Jews.
    8. They tell us Abraham’s seed means believers are related to Christ, whom they say is the true seed of Abraham; Thus the church is true Israel, … they say.
    9. Galatians 3:7 and 29 do not say Israel has been replaced; they merely teach that people (Jewish or Gentile) who put their faith in Christ become partakers of the spiritual promises God made to Abraham. … “There is neither Jew nor Greek… for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
  1. What does God say about Israel’s future? If the New Testament teaches ethnic Israel has a future, then Replacement Theology is untrue.
    1. According to the New Testament, the nation of Israel and the Promised Land are vital to God establishing His restored Kingdom on Earth.
    2. The Bible teaches that Jesus fulfills the Davidic Covenant that guarantees a descendant of David will sit on David’s throne in Israel forever.
    3. The Hebrew Scriptures teach the Messiah will rule over Israel and the Gentile nations from His throne in Jerusalem (Isa. 9:6– 7; 11:1–12; Jer. 23:5–8; 33:14–16).
    4. The Old Testament prophets taught the Messiah will restore God’s Kingdom to Earth
    5. God will transform Earth to its pre-fall condition. No more disasters, disease, sickness, deformities, hard labor, thorns and thistles, pollution, wild nature in animals, injustice, or war.
    6. Thus Jesus said He will sit on His throne when Earth is restored to its condition as in the beginning—the restored Kingdom of God on Earth.
    7. Peter laid out an eschatological order for Israel. The nation’s repentance will lead God to blot out its sins; Christ will return, and then the times of refreshing will come from God when He restores the Kingdom.
    8. Peter didn’t teach Replacement Theology. Rather, he taught that God has a unique program for Israel that is key to God restoring His Kingdom on Earth.
    9. Paul also taught this truth: “ I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. ” (Rom. 11:1-2).
    10. Israel’s coming national reconciliation, Christ’s return, and the restoration of God’s Kingdom on Earth do not depend on anything the Jewish people have or have not done. They depend solely on God’s faithfulness to keep His irrevocable promises.
    11. According to Ezekiel 36, God will keep His promises for His name’s sake so that His name will be exalted above every name on Earth, under the earth, and in the heavens.
  2. Nowhere does the Bible teach God has rejected Israel or replaced it with the church.
  3. Nowhere does the Bible teach God has only two Covenants: Works and Grace.

Info from Friends of Israel, article by James Showers accessed 9/9/2016

Replacement Theology and Amillenianism

A dangerous and errant tenant of Reformed Theology, Calvinism, and the Presbyterian Denomination is called Replacement Theology. It, and its link to Amillenianism, is captured by George Zellor, Pastor of Middleton Bible Church, Middletown CT.

Replacement Theology: This view teaches that the Church has replaced Israel in the plan and purpose of God. The many promises made to Israel in the Bible (especially the kingdom promises) are fulfilled in the Christian Church, in a non-literal way. The prophecies in Scripture concerning the blessing and restoration of Israel to the Land of Promise are “spiritualized” into promises of God’s blessing for the Church. The prophecies of condemnation and judgment, however, still remain for national Israel.

Amillennialism: This view harmonizes well with “replacement theology.” It teaches that there will be no future kingdom. Rather, the kingdom promises are being fulfilled (in a non-literal way) by the church. The nation Israel will not enjoy a future millennial kingdom, nor will the Messiah rule over the world from an earthly Davidic throne in Jerusalem. The kingdom of God is being enjoyed today in the hearts of believers in a spiritual way, but the nation Israel has no future kingdom to look forward to.6

The Premillennial Return of Christ

Christ promised that he would return as King of kings and Lord of lords, and set up his kingdom, setting on the Throne of David in the city of Jerusalem. When God promised “My king upon my holy hill of Zion” he said of his Christ, “Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shall break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel” (Psalm 2:6, 7). This kingdom is called millennial because it is promised to last for 1,000 years7. Roman religionists rejected it and called it chiliasm after the Latin word for one thousand. For the Bible believer to suppose that such a millennial reign of Christ could be ushered in by any Vicar of Christ from the Roman Catholic Church, prior to the second advent of the Lord Jesus Christ is clearly and emphatically heretical. The Bible doctrine of the premillennial return of Christ, insists that Christ will return to set up his kingdom before the kingdom will be set up, and that once set up that kingdom will rule this earth for the literal 1,000 years which the inerrant Word of God decrees.

One is not a sinner because they sin, rather one sins because they are sinner. Likewise, a church or denomination is not apostate because they have heretical teachings, rather a church or denomination has heretical teachings because they are apostate. This is a profound concept, and worthy of a profound understanding. When Flavius Valerius Constantinus (272 – 337 AD) saw a vision which, in his mind, assured him that he should conquer in the sign of the Christ, he made his pagan warriors carry Christ’s monogram on their shields. When this mysticism resulted in his victory, the upcoming Emperor of Rome forced a similar paganism to be the universal religion of the Roman Empire. Thus was hatched the vile and apostate Roman Catholic Church which forced all Roman subjects to convert or die. This Roman Religion was not Christianity. It structured an apostate church from its inception, and this apostate church rejected the premillennial return of the Lord Jesus Christ because it was an apostate church.

A Systematic Theology must first have as its foundation a true Bible Doctrine. From that foundation a discourse must systematically analyze the doctrine keeping it pure from its detractors, and evaluating its fit into the larger arena of theology. Detractors from truth are myriad from outside but internally they fall under three major considerations. First, The Roman Catholic Religion has always directly opposed Bible truth; second the Protestant Reformers, it is supposed, have come back to Bible truth, but, subtly, they still carry all the Roman error as concealed weapons; and third, the ecumenical Bible correctors who make a pretense of using textual criticism and modern language to “fix” what God was unable to preserve. These three are enemies to Bible doctrine, Roman, directly; Reformed, more subliminally; and Ecumenical Bible correctors, very shrewdly. Exposing their pernicious ways is not generally the focus of a Bible Doctrines book, but in a world where Bible doctrine is under constant attack, such a systematic approach needs to be expounded.

The Pretribulation Rapture of the Church

Once one understands the premillennial return of Christ, the upcoming dispensation of the kingdom age, and the transition period between the grace and kingdom dispensations, the Scriptures which point out the pretribulation rapture of the church, jump off the page of their Bible. The late Evangelist Lauren Dawson was contending for the faith with some Calvinistic reformed theologians. They said, “We just don’t see how you can get the pretribulation rapture out of that Scripture!” He responded, “That is my point, you cannot get it out of the Scripture. God put it in there and it has been there for over nineteen hundred years. I don’t see how you can reject God’s truth of the pretribulational rapture of the church.”

For the world seeing is believing, but for the Christian believing is seeing. When someone is entrenched in the Roman doctrine of Replacement Theology, when they are mislead by John Calvin’s Covenant Theology, when they will not delineated God’s dispensations and the transitions between them, they will not “see” the pretribulational rapture of the church. … in draft fff

Cambron’s Chapter 9 Eschatology – The Doctrine of Last Things

A solid Biblical Doctrine must form the basis and starting point for a systematic theology. There is no truer, or more thorough, published, Baptist, and Biblical doctrine than that of Dr. Mark G. Cambron.8 His teachings on Ecclesiology at Tennessee Temple Bible School thoroughly lay the foundation for this systematic theology. His book, Bible Doctrines9 will, with the permission of the Cambron Institute10, be given in block quotes throughout this effort. The book is readily available through, and it forms the foundational basis for this Systematic Theology.11

Believing in the verbal inspiration of the Holy Scriptures and believing that every single word is directly chosen by God, it is necessary to preserve and defend the doctrines extracted from Scripture and presented by Dr. Cambron. Below, in a block quote of his book, is his extensive analysis of Eschatology:[block quote of Dr. Cambron’s Bible Doctrines page 249-288}

Pg 205-207


Sections I – V

Sections VI – XII

I. Physical Death.

Death Is Not a Cessation of Being.

Death Is Not Soul Sleep.

Death Means Separation.

II. The Bodily Resurrection.

A. The Fact of Resurrection.

B. The Nature of the Resurrection.

C. The Time of the Resurrection.

III. The Intermediate State.

Before the Cross.

At the Time of the Cross.

After the Cross.

IV. The Second Coming of Christ.

A. The Importance of the Doctrine.

B. The Meaning of the Second Coming.

C. The Events of the Second Coming.

V. The Antichrist.

His Person.

His Titles.

His Forerunners.

His Work.

His Career.

His Time.

His Appearance.

His End.

VI. The Tribulation.

The Tribulation of the Body of Christ.

The Tribulation of Israel.

The Great Tribulation.

VII. The Battle of Armageddon.

What It Is Not. What It Is.

VIII. The Millennium.

The Fact of the Millennium.

The Description of the Millennium.

The Types of the Millennium.

The Conditions During the Millennium.

IX. The Judgments.

Judgments of the Christian.

Judgment of the Nations.

Judgment at the Great White Throne.

X. After the Millennium.

Satan Loosed.

Nations Gathered.

Army Destroyed.

Satan Doomed.

XI. The Future of the Wicked.

The Scriptural Teaching.

The Terms Used.

The Theories Proposed.

XII. Heaven.

First Heaven.

Second Heaven.

Third Heaven.

Page 208 –

Chapter IX ESCHATOLOGY Eschatology is the doctrine of last things.


The Bible always gives sufficient information for the faith of the believer. The Bible was

never proposed merely for his curiosity. God teaches finite beings to walk by faith in the

unexplained infinite.

A. Death Is Not a Cessation of Being.

Thirty-five hundred years ago Job asked, “If a man die, shall he live again?” This

question has been asked for millenniums. It is still a universal question. It is a subject of

perennial interest. That those whom we love should die and be buried does not seem

right; and it is not! God never made man to die; He created him to live and to have

fellowship with Himself. But sin brought death and the grave, thus separation from God.

Should the Lord tarry, everyone reading these words, the author included, shall die, for

death has passed upon all men (Rom. 5:12).

A poem lasts longer than the poet; the voice on the recording tape can be heard years

after the recording artist is dead; pictures of dead loved ones remain, even after the loved

ones are gone.

Things on this earth are not equal. The rich have always oppressed the poor; the wicked

have always prospered over the righteous. Human justice demands an equalization of all

things in a life after death. We are living in a changing world. The robins build their

nests, even as they did in the garden of Eden, and animals possess the same

characteristics as they did at the beginning. However, man does not live as he used to,

even as he did twenty-five years ago. Although this be true, the inquiring mind of man

remains the same, still asking the question, “If a man dies, will he live again?”

There is a universal belief in a life after death. If you go to the darkest part of Africa,

where Christ has never been preached, you find that people there believe in a life after

death. Why do some heathens burn their wives? Why do some bury food with the corpse?

They believe that the departed one must have a companion and food on his journey

beyond the grave. The Egyptians furnished a charter, a book for the journey, and placed it

with the corpse. Why do the birds fly south? Instinct in them proves there is a southland.

The heart of man, and his inward instinct are proofs that there is a life hereafter. Both

physiology and philosophy maintain there must be a life after death.


There are two great reservations:

1. Reservation for the Christian. “Our Lord Jesus Christ . . . hath begotten us . . . to an

inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for

you” (I Peter 1:4). In Philippians 1:23 the Apostle Paul used the word “depart” as

describing death. By this he did not mean that he would cease to exist. Depart means “to

depart.” Did he mean to depart to the grave with Christ? Of course not, for Christ is not in

the grave; He is in heaven. II Corinthians 5:8 makes the meaning of departure even

clearer when it says, “We are confident . . . and willing … to be absent from the body, and

to be present with the Lord” The word “present” means “to be at home with.” The death

of a Christian, therefore, is pictured as a ship pulling up anchor and setting sail for home;

in other words, the death of a Christian means “going home.”

2. Reservation for the Ungodly. “The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of

temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished” (II Peter


B. Death Is Not Soul Sleep.

The word “sleep” in Scripture, concerning the dead in Christ, means “rest.” It does not

mean “unconsciousness.” The body may die, but the soul and spirit will never die. In the

resurrection it is the body that is raised, not the soul and spirit. The Scriptures clearly

state that the soul is absent from the body, present with the Lord; and that the souls and

spirits are fully awake and aware of things round about them. A perfect illustration of the

above truth is found in Revelation 6:9, 10: “When he had opened the fifth seal, I saw

under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the

testimony which they held: and they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord,

holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?”

Here we see the disembodied souls, alive, and reasoning with God.

The Apostle Paul says, “For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain” (Phil. 1:21). “To

live” meant that Paul had perfect fellowship with the living Christ. If death were the end,

why would Paul say, “and to die is gain?”

C. Death Means Separation.

Death in Scripture always means “separation.” Physical death is the separation of the

soul and spirit from the body. Spiritual death is the eternal, complete, final separation

from God (Rev. 21:8).

Life means “union” (John 3:16). Death means “separation” (Rom. 8:35-39). The ego, the

I,” lives in the house of flesh. You are not a body, having a soul and spirit, but you are a

soul and spirit possessing a body. Scientists used to tell us that the bodies in which we

live change every seven years; now they say that they change every seven days. Our

bodies may change, but we ourselves, that is, our ego, never changes. People cannot see


us, the ego, but only the house, or tent, in which we dwell. Death is the departure from

this house (II Peter 1:13,14; Phil. 1:21,24; Gal. 2:20; II Cor. 5:6,7; Job 19:26; Luke

16:26; II Tim. 4:6; II Cor. 12:2). People have been burying bodies for six thousand years;

just the bodies, not the persons.

The soul is the seat of feeling and appetite; from Scripture we believe it is the exact

counterpart of the body. The spirit is the seat of man’s intelligence. When Samuel was

called up by the request of Saul, it was his spirit that appeared, not his body. Death, then,

is not a circle, or a square. We shall not be formless if we depart this life, but our souls

and spirits shall be fully conscious, existing in the same form and shape as our bodies.

Memory may be seated in the brain, but the brain is not the source of thought. We may

remember things that happened ten years ago, but we do not have the same brain that we

had ten years ago. I possess a brain, but the brain is not I. Death simply means, “I have

departed”; I am separated from my body.


A. The Fact of the Resurrection.

1. Anticipated in the Old Testament. Such terms as “in the latter days,” “awake and

live,” are indications of a resurrection. The Old Testament contains many types of the

resurrection. Joseph was counted dead, but he came back to his father; Jonah was in the

belly of the fish for three days and three nights, and then was released; Daniel was placed

in the lion’s den, a place of death, but came out alive; Israel died in the wilderness, and a

new Israel went in Canaan. All of these are figures of the resurrection. The following

Scriptures verify the resurrection. “Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body

shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs,

and the earth shall cast out the dead” (Is. 26:19). See also Job 19:26, 27; Psalm 16:9, 11;

Daniel 6:23; 12:2; Matthew 12:40.

2. Revealed In the New Testament. “As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be

made alive” (I Cor. 15:22). “[I] have hope toward God, which they themselves also

allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust” (Acts

24:15). See also Matthew 22:30-32; Luke 14:13, 14; 20:35, 36; John 5:28, 29; 6:39, 40,

44, 54; I Thessalonians 4:14-16: II Timothy 1:10. Christ did not come to save my soul

only, but all of me: my soul, spirit, and body. All of me is to be saved.

B. The Nature of the Resurrection.

Death is never set forth as the hope of the believer. In Corinth (I Cor. 15) some had

declared that there was no bodily resurrection, but in the above chapter Paul rebukes

them for this false doctrine and proves to them that there is a resurrection (by Christ’s

own resurrection): if one does not believe in man’s resurrection, then it is impossible to

believe in Christ’s resurrection; and if Christ had no resurrection, there is no Gospel, and

if no Gospel, we are not saved.


Satan has always been against the Word, and he has many weapons trained on it. The

revelation he most despises is that of the resurrection. Materialism denies the resurrection

altogether. Spiritualism denies the bodily resurrection. We are never to doubt the

resurrection. “I forgot God when I said, How can this be?” Whether man believes, or

understands the resurrection means little; it is true, nevertheless.

Some people cannot believe that flesh and bones shall be perfect. When speaking of

Christ’s resurrection, they maintain that it was a spiritual resurrection. We know by this

statement that they do not know what they are talking about. Jesus Christ’s spirit was not

put in the tomb; only His body was. The Roman soldiers were not stationed at the

sepulcher to guard His spirit, but to guard His body. It was His body they guarded; it was

His body which arose from the dead!

One Scripture used by those who believe only in a spiritual resurrection is I Corinthians

15:44: “It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and

there is a spiritual body.” Notice that the verse does not say “a spirit body,” but “a

spiritual body.” The natural body is controlled by the soul; the spiritual body shall be

controlled by the Spirit; hence, a spiritual body.

1. Theories Proposed.

a. Germ Theory. This is an old Jewish belief found in the Talmud. According to it, in

man there is a little bone, called a “luz,” which death can not destroy, and out of that

germ the body will be resurrected. Some Christians hold to this theory, using I

Corinthians 15:36, 37 for support.

b. Identity Theory. This is the belief that the body in the resurrection will be raised

just as it was buried. A body buried with an arm missing, will be raised with an arm

missing; an infant buried will be an infant raised; a lunatic buried, a lunatic raised. The

Mohammedans hold to this theory. If this be true, we will not be like Jesus.

c. Reincarnation Theory. This idea supposes that when a man dies he goes

immediately into another body. If this should occur, we would not be “at home” with the

Lord. When a person dies, he is not a complete human being; he can only be so by a

bodily resurrection (I Thess. 5:23).

d. Intermediate Body Theory. This theory contends that the believer receives his

resurrected body immediately upon his death. It is based on II Corinthians 5:1-4: “We

know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of

God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan,

earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven: if so be that

being clothed we shall not be found naked. For we that are in this tabernacle do groan,

being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality

might be swallowed up of life.” But the above Scripture refers only to those believers

who are living when Christ comes.

2. Truth Believed. The resurrection is by Divine Power! “God giveth a body as it has

pleased him, and to every seed his own body” (I Cor. 15:38). Jesus Christ’s own

resurrected body was proved to be flesh and bone. When Christ appeared unto the


disciples, He remarked, “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and

see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have” (Luke 24:39). Christ did not

say that there were no spirits, but that a spirit does not have flesh and bones. Ezekiel 37

pictures the resurrection of Israel; flesh, bones and spirit are mentioned, but no blood.

The law demanded the shedding of blood, and Christ shed his blood to pay for that

demand. In the resurrection, all will be raised without blood; life will be in the spirit of


[The Lord Jesus Christ] shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto

his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things

unto himself” (Phil. 3:20, 21). Our bodies, the same ones that may be planted in death,

will pass under a great transformation and be raised. If we should plant a lily, a lily will

come up; if we plant wheat, wheat will come up; if we plant tares, tares will come up; if

we plant human bodies, glorified human bodies will come up. God looks upon the

cemeteries as nothing but harvest fields. The seeds in these harvest fields are the bodies

of the dead, and the harvest is the resurrection.

And we shall be changed” (I Cor. 15:52c). Yes, a great transformation will take place,

but it will be the same body, for the resurrected body of Christ proves that it will be the

same body, as He bore in His resurrected body the print of the nails.

I Corinthians 15:42-44 describes fully the resurrection of the just (God tells nothing of the

bodies of the damned in their resurrection): “It is sown in corruption; it is raised in

incorruption.” A dead body is a corruptible body. A live body is a mortal body. Nothing

is ever said in Scripture of planting a mortal body. A corruptible body is subject to decay

and dust, but one day it will be raised in incorruption, a body fit for heaven, that can

never be subject to corruption again. “It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory.” These

vile bodies have been dishonored by sin, but one day they will be raised in glory like unto

the glorious body of our Lord. “It is sown in weakness; it is raised in power.” Sin has

made us weak, also. The weakest thing in the world is a dead body. In order for a dead

man to move, he must be moved. He has eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear;

he makes no protest about being put in a coffin and placed in a grave. There is no

resistance in a dead body. These same weak bodies shall be raised with great power.

Notice what man can do for the eyes today, but think what God will do. The resurrected

believer will be able to see spiritual beings. Mortal man has the microscope and

telescope, but, oh, what eyesight our new bodies will have! Today we have limits of

speed, but in the resurrection there will be no limit. Do not make present standards the

limit of our future standards. “It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body.” The

natural body is our animated body, containing flesh, bones and blood. Our resurrected

spiritual bodies shall not be spirit-bodies, but spiritual; they will be bodies composed of

only flesh and bone, no blood, dominated by our spirits.

C. The Time of the Resurrection.

As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (I Cor. 15:22). All men

shall be raised from the dead, but not all at the same time. The Scriptures plainly declare


that there are two resurrections, and not a general resurrection. They are the first, and the

last resurrection (Rev. 20:5, 6).

1. The First Resurrection. The first resurrection includes Christ, and all believers of all

ages. Their resurrection occurs at different intervals. Christ at one time; the Church at the

Rapture (before the Tribulation); and the Old Testament saints and Tribulation saints

after the Tribulation.

a. Christ the Firstfruits. “Now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits

of them that slept” (I Cor. 15:20). The firstfruits was God’s pledge that the entire

harvest would come later. Christ’s being the Firstfruits is God’s pledge that the harvest

will be coming later. “Because I live, ye shall live also” (John 14:19b). There are records

of others being raised from the dead, but these were “resuscitations,” or restorations; they

died again. Christ liveth to die no more! “Behold, I am alive for evermore” (Rev. 1:18b).

b. The Saints at Christ’s Resurrection. “The graves were opened; and many bodies of

the saints which slept arose, and came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went

into the holy city, and appeared unto many” (Matt. 27:52, 53). On one occasion, the Lord

Jesus said, “Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it

die, it bringeth forth much fruit” (John 12:24). Christ did die and was planted as a corn of

wheat, but when He was raised from the dead, He brought forth much fruit with Him.

This fruit was the saints who arose immediately after His resurrection. We do not know

how many were raised, nor do we know where they went. They may have gone up to

heaven with him, for remember, he was the Firstfruits, and we know that in the Feast of

Firstfruits, a sheaf of the wave offering was waved before the Lord. There was more than

one grain in the sheaf. Thus, we are led to believe that there were more people in the

firstfruits to go to heaven than just Christ.

c. The Body of Christ (The Church). The Church will have a resurrection of its own.

The dead in Christ shall rise first” (I Thess. 4:16). The Church was never known in the

Old Testament (See Chapter VII). Therefore, the Old Testament prophets saw nothing of

its Spiritual baptism, rapture, resurrection and transformation. The Church was a mystery

hid in God; it was first revealed to the Apostle Paul (Eph. 3:1-9). However, the old

Testament saints did know of their own resurrection, which shall occur after the

Tribulation (Dan. 12:2, 13).

The resurrection of the Church was revealed to the Apostle Paul; it will occur before the

Tribulation. “Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from

the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon

the earth” (Rev. 3:10). See also I Thessalonians 1:10.

There has been over nineteen hundred years since Christ the Firstfruits has been raised.

The time of the resurrection of the Church is not known.

d. Old Testament and Tribulation Saints. This phase of the first resurrection takes

place after the Tribulation, at least seven years after the Church is raised. It includes all

saints who do not belong to the Body of Christ. “Go thy way till the end be: for thou shalt

rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days” (Dan. 12:13). See also Daniel 12:1,2.

2. The Last Resurrection. The last (or second) resurrection occurs after the


Millennium, and shall include all the wicked dead. They shall be raised to stand before

the Great White Throne. “The rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years

were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the

first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of

God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years” (Rev. 20:5, 6).


Where are the dead? is the question on the lips of all mankind. The only true and correct

answer is given by the Word of God. Other answers, such as those given by spiritualism,

are nothing but a babel of voices. Various cults have preyed upon unsuspecting souls,

taking them captive at the Devil’s will.

The following are things to remember as we explain the intermediate state, the state of

man between death and resurrection: Death is the separation of the soul and spirit from

the body. The soul and spirit are together in death. The soul is the seat of the appetite, and

the spirit is the seat of knowledge, and they both function in death, as shown by the

example of the rich man in Hades. He was in torment; he had feelings. He reasoned; thus,

his spirit and soul were together.

The word “Sheol” and the word “Hades” are the same. “Sheol” is the Old Testament

Hebrew word. “Hades” is the New Testament Greek word. We know they are the same,

for the Apostle Peter, at Pentecost, quoted from Psalm 16, saying, “Thou wilt not leave

my soul in hell [hades], neither wilt thou suffer thy Holy One to see corruption” (Acts

2:27). Psalm 16 uses the word “Sheol” for hell [Hades]. Thus, Hades and Sheol are the

same. This is the place of departed souls and spirits. The mistranslation of the words

Sheol” and “Hades” by the King James translators has caused much trouble in the

Church today. They translated these words to mean hell (the place of everlasting

punishment), grave, pit, and the like. The wrong translation has led people to believe that

the grave is the only hell. Sheol and Hades are the names of the same place for the

departed spirits of man.

1. These words are never found in the plural.

2. Sheol and Hades are never located on the face of the earth.

3. The Bible never speaks of an individual’s Sheol.

4. Man never puts anyone in it, as the grave.

5. Man never digs or makes a Sheol, or Hades.

6. The Bible never speaks of a man touching Sheol.

7. The Bible never speaks of a body going into Sheol, but with one exception, and the

exception proves the rule. Korah (Num. 16:28-33) defied the leadership of Moses and the


priesthood of Aaron, and influenced many in Israel against them. God showed His

displeasure by causing the earth to open up its jaws and swallow Korah and his family.

The King James Version says that he went down alive into the pit, which should be

translated “Sheol” (Num. 16:33).

In Luke 16:19-31 we have the true account of Lazarus and the rich man both dying and

existing in the intermediate state. There are some who claim that this story was only a

parable. The Word does not so state. In all of His parables, the Lord never mentioned

proper names, as He does here. If it were a parable, it would be true, for every parable

that He spoke was built upon the truth (Matt. 13:3).

The following is a common interpretation of this so-called parable:

Rich man — the Jewish nation, rich in what God has given him.

Lazarus — the Gentiles — poor at the door of the rich man.

Both died — end of the dispensation, when both are blessed by the Gospel.

Why say this refers to Jew and Gentile, when the Scriptures do not say so? Why did the

Lord use the rich man in picturing the Jewish nation, when in the preceding passages he

was warning the rich? The idea of the Jews ever requesting aid of the Gentiles is


There is no gulf between the Jew and the Gentile. No Gentile nation has ever begged

from the Jews as Lazarus begged bread from the rich man.

If the Jewish nation died (pictured by the rich man), who were the five brethren who were

left? We still contend that this is a true account of two men who died and went to Hades.

A. Before the Cross.

The Cross is the dividing line of many Scriptural truths. We shall discuss the question,

where did men go at death before Christ died upon the Cross? We shall show that they all

went to the same place — Hades (Sheol) — but in different parts.

From Numbers 16:33 we learn that Sheol, or Hades, is somewhere inside the earth.

They, and all that appertained to them went down alive into Sheol, and the earth closed

upon them: and they perished from among the congregation.” From Luke 16:19-31 we

see that Hades was in two compartments: Abraham’s Bosom, the place of the departed

righteous, where Lazarus went; and the place of torment, where the rich man went. A

great gulf separated these two sections.

Since we know that Sheol (Hades) is somewhere in the earth, and that it is composed of

two compartments, we turn to the Lord Himself to find the exact location. “For as Jonas

was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three

days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matt.12:40). Ephesians 4:9, 10 makes

this clearer still. “Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the


lower parts of the earth. He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all

heavens, that he might fill all things.” Philippians 2:9, 10 says, “God . . . hath highly

exalted him . . . that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and

things in earth, and things under the earth.” This speaks of the future adoration of Christ

by all creation. However, we want to call attention to the above underlined words. To go

under the earth” means to submerge, as a submarine which goes under water. Thus, we

conclude that Sheol (Hades) is in the heart of the earth, composed of two sections, one

part for the righteous dead and the other for the unrighteous dead, with a great gulf fixed

between them. By the Lord’s revelation of the rich man and Lazarus, which occurred

before He died on the Cross, we see where all men, whether righteous, or unrighteous,

went after death, before the Cross.

B. At the Time of the Cross.

Under this heading we shall deal with only two persons, the Lord Jesus, and the penitent

thief. Upon death, the Lord Jesus went to Hades. We know this from Psalm 16:10, which

says, “Thou wilt not leave my soul in Sheol; neither wilt thou suffer thine holy one to see

corruption.” The Apostle Peter, on the day of Pentecost, quoted from this same passage,

but, of course, he used the Greek word “Hades,” instead of “Sheol.” These words

describe the resurrection of Christ, while fully stating that he went to Hades. We see this

by the use of the word “leave.” The Holy Ghost would not have employed the word

leave” if he had not gone there. As to the thief on the cross, he went to Hades with Jesus,

into the compartment reserved for the righteous dead. “Today shalt thou be with me in

paradise” (Luke 23: 43b). How many days was Jesus in Hades? Three days. On the first

of the three days, the thief was to be with Jesus in paradise; therefore, we learn that

paradise was another name given to Abraham’s Bosom, which was the place of the

righteous dead.

C. After the Cross.

Now where do the departed go at death? The unrighteous still go to Sheol (Hades),

awaiting the last judgment.

The righteous, praise the Lord, go at once to heaven to be with the Lord. “We are

confident . . . and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the

Lord” (II Cor. 5:8). When Christ arose from the dead “he led captivity captive” (Eph.

4:8). Christ emptied Hades (Sheol) of all the righteous, and took them and paradise with

him to glory. Paradise was, at one time, in the heart of the earth; now it is in the third

heavens. “I knew a man in Christ about fourteen years ago (whether in the body, I cannot

tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the

third heaven. And I knew such a man (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot

tell: God knoweth;) how that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable

words which is not lawful for a man to utter” (II Cor. 12:2-4).



A. The Importance of the Doctrine.

It is said that one out of every twenty-five verses of the New Testament speaks of the

Second Coming, while in the Old Testament there are eight verses concerning the Second

Coming to every verse concerning the First Coming. In the promise of a Redeemer (Gen.

3:15), the Second Coming is mentioned before the First Coming. “It shall bruise thy head

[occurs at the Second Coming], and thou shalt bruise his heel [occurred at the First

Coming, upon the Cross].”

1. Testimony of Our Lord. “If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and

receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (John 14:3). See also

Matthew 24, 25; Mark 13; Luke 21.

2. Testimony of Angels. “Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this

same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye

have seen him go into heaven” (Acts 1:11).

3. Testimony of Peter. “He shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto

you” (Acts 3:20). See also I Peter 5:4; II Peter 1:16.

4. Testimony of Paul. “I thank my God always on your behalf . . . that in every thing

ye are enriched by him . . . so that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of

our Lord Jesus Christ” (I Cor. 1:4-7). See also Romans 11:26: I Corinthians 15:23; II

Corinthians 5; Philippians 3:20; Colossians 3:4; I Thessalonians (all); II Thessalonians

1:7, 10; I Timothy 6:14; II Timothy 4:8; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 9:28.

5. Testimony of James. The prophets, quoted by James, represent the Lord as saying,

After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen

down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up” (Acts 15:16). See also

James 5:7.

6. Testimony of John. “Beloved, now are we the Sons of God, and it doth not yet

appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him;

for we shall see him as he is” (I John 3:2). See also I John 2:28, and the Book of


7. Testimony of Jude. “Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these,

saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints” (Jude 14).

B. The Meaning of the Second Coming.

1. Negative.

a. It Is Not Death. Death is the departing of the saint, not the coming of the Lord. The

Lord will come, but death may never come.


b. It Is Not the Fall of Jerusalem. Luke 21:20-24, and I Thessalonians 4:13-18 did

not occur when Jerusalem fell. The second coming of Christ is connected with the

gathering of Israel, not the scattering.

c. It Is Not the Coming of the Holy Spirit. Christ said that He would send another

(John 14:16). I Thessalonians 4: 13-18 did not occur when the Holy Spirit came. Notice

that all of the Epistles which speak of the Second Coming were written after Pentecost.

d. It Is Not the Conversion of a Sinner. If this is true, He has come millions of times.

According to I Corinthians 15:51-57, the dead would have to be raised every time a soul

was saved, and then get back into the grave, waiting for another to be saved.

e. It Is Not the Diffusion of Christianity. By this some mean the spreading of the

Gospel. But remember, this same Jesus, a personal Christ, is to come again.

f. It Is Not the End of the World. When Christ comes, the world will not be

destroyed, for He will reign a thousand years after He appears.

2. Positive.

a. It Will Be a Personal Coming. John 14:3 says, “I will come.” We are not to expect

a spirit, but a Spirit in a body. I Thessalonians 4:16, 17 uses the word “himself.” Acts

1:11 declares “this same Jesus”; not some other person or thing is expected, but Christ


b. It Will Be a Visible Coming. “As the lightning cometh out of the East, and shineth

even unto the West; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be” (Matt. 24:27). See

also Zechariah 12:10; Revelation 1:7.

c. Meaning of the Words Used.

(1) Parousia. This means the personal presence, the coming presence. It is spoken

not only of the coming of the Lord, but of the coming of other men (I Cor. 16:17; II Cor.

7:6,7; Philippians 1:26). Concerning the coming of the Lord, it is at that moment, when

absence ceases and presence begins (Matt. 24:3, 27; I Cor. 15:23; I Thess. 2:9; Jas. 5:8).

(2) Epiphaneia. This simply means “appearing.” It is used of both advents (II Tim.

1:10; II Thess. 2:8; I Tim. 6:14; II Tim. 4:1,8; Titus 2:13).

(3) Apokalupsis. The literal meaning is “unveiling revelation.” It emphasizes the

visibility of the Lord’s return (II Thess. 1:7; I Peter 1:7, 13; 4:13. It is used also for men:

Romans 8:19; II Thessalonians 2:3,6, 8).

d. It Is a Coming in Two Phases.

(1) When Christ Comes for His Saints in the Air. “We beseech you, brethren, by the

coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him” (II Thess. 2:1).

The promise of Christ’s return of Acts 1:9-20 was given before the Rapture was revealed.

Hebrews 9:28 has nothing to do with the Rapture.

(2) When Christ Comes with His Saints to Earth. “Enoch also, the seventh from

Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his

saints” (Jude 14).

(3) These Two Phases Are Vastly Different.

(a) Different in Character. “For His people” is an act of faith; “with His people”

is an act of judgment.

(b) Different in Manner. One is secret, the other is a manifestation.

(c) Different in Place. “For His people” — in the air (I Thess. 4:17); “with His

people” — to the earth (Zech. 14:14).


(d) Different as to Time. “For His people” occurs before the Tribulation (Jacob’s

trouble); “with His people” occurs after the Tribulation (Jacob’s trouble). We are never

told in Scripture to look for signs preceding His coming for His saints, but men are told to

look for signs before He comes with His saints (Compare II Thess. 2:1-3 with Is. 13: 6-9).

(e) Different as to Dispensations. Coming “for His saints” occurs at the

beginning of the dispensation of Tribulation; coming “with His saints” occurs at the

beginning of the dispensation of the Millennium.

(f) Different as to Purpose. Coming “for His saints” fulfills His promise to gather

His people (John 14:3); coming “with His saints” as a man of war, His promise to

overthrow His enemies (Jude 14).

(g) Different as to Relation. “For His saints” is the adoption of the children of

God; “with His saints” the time that the sons of God are manifested to the world. (Rom.


C. The Events of the Second Coming in Relation to the Body of Christ.

As we deal with the Rapture of the Church, we recognize the fact that the word “rapture”

is not a Scriptural word. The Rapture is, however, a Scriptural fact.

1. The Resurrection of the Dead in Christ. “The Lord Himself shall descend from

heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the

dead in Christ shall rise first” (I Thess. 4:16). The very first thing that happens is the

resurrection of the body of Christ. Certainly this will include all who die before reaching

the age of accountability, such as babes, the mentally retarded, and the like. If Christ does

not come, there will be no resurrection, and if no resurrection, then man shall be an

eternal spirit. If diamonds can be made from soot, sapphire from clay, and opals from

sand, what will God make out of our bodies? It will be wonderful, will it not?

2. The Renovation of the Living in Christ. “Behold, I shew you a mystery; we shall not

all sleep, but we shall all be changed. . . . and we shall be changed. . . . And this mortal

must put on immortality” (I Cor. 15:51-53). The Christian is one who is not looking for

death, but for the conqueror of death. The words “we shall not all sleep” mean “we shall

not all die.” What a glorious hope this is! What a shout that will be that day! “O death,

where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” (I Cor. 15:55). Isn’t it a blessed hope

that it is possible for us to go without dying? No man, not even a Christian, wants to die.

That is natural. The Christian, however, is one who is not afraid to die. The Christian is

the only person who has a hope of never seeing death. Yes, we know the Scripture says,

It is appointed unto men once to die.” But the Scripture does not only say all men! The

changing of us who are alive and remain at His coming is not death, for we shall not all


3. The Rapture of All in Christ. “Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our

Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, that ye be not soon shaken in

mind . . . as that the day of the Lord is at hand” (II Thess. 2:1, 2). The above Scripture,

and the phrase, “we all shall be changed,” eliminates the possibility of a partial rapture.

The entire Body of Christ will be raptured (caught up); it will be a rapture, and not a


rupture. The Body of Christ will be complete. No member of His Body will be left to go

through the Tribulation. Some say, “How can this be?” God took Elijah up without death;

He can take a million, or ten million up just as easily.

The Rapture of the Church will cause a great separation. All unbelievers will be left here

to go through the Tribulation. The Rapture of the Church will be the means of a great

reunion. “Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in

the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord” (I Thess.

4:17). What a great word is “together”; all of our loved ones in Christ “together” once


We should live soberly, righteously, and godly . . . looking for that blessed hope, and the

glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13). What do

we mean by “looking for Christ”? It does not mean that we believe that He may come at

any moment, but that we are looking for Him to come. Are you looking for Him today?

Are you looking for Him tonight? That is what the Scripture means by “looking for



I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it

shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel” (Gen. 3:15). While this verse speaks

of Christ as the seed of the woman, it also prophetically declares the Antichrist as being

the seed of the serpent. The seed of the serpent, the Antichrist, is mentioned first in the

first book of the Bible, and described fully in the last book of the Bible; it can be traced in

between as well. This is very significant.

A. His Person.

The Early Church taught that Nero was the Antichrist, and that when he died he would be

raised from the dead. In the eleventh century the Waldenses, Hussites and Wycliffites

declared that the Roman Catholic Church was the Antichrist. The Roman Catholic

Church, in turn, declared that Napoleon was the Antichrist. During World War I Kaiser

Wilhelm of Germany was thought to be the Man of Sin. Many men will be proposed for

this office, but it is useless to speculate, for he will not be revealed until after the Rapture

of the Church (II Thess. 2:1-12).

He Is a Man! “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the

beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred three score and six”

(Rev. 13:18). Notice the Scripture says he has the number of a man. Man’s number is 6.

God says his number is 6-6-6: he is a man; he is a man; he is a man! He is not the Roman

Catholic Church; he is not a system; he is a man. He will rule in Jerusalem, and not in


1. He Will Be a Jew. “Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers” (Dan. 11:37a).

God of his fathers” means Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. “I am come in my Father’s name,


and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive” (John

5:43). The word “another” implies “another Jew.” The name Antichrist is a Jewish title,

and the Jews will not accept a Gentile as their Messiah.

2. He Will Be a Genius. He will be the most remarkable man the world has ever seen

apart from Jesus Christ.

a. An Intellectual Genius. “In the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors

are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall

stand up” (Dan. 8:23). See also Ezekiel 28:3.

b. An Oratorical Genius. “He shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by

flatteries” (Dan. 11:21b). He shall be a mockery and an imitation of Him of whom it is

said. “Never man spake like this man.”

c. A Governmental Genius. He rises from obscurity to power. He is the “little horn”

spoken of in Daniel 7 and 8, and the “beast” of Revelation 13 and 14. All kings will give

their power to him.

d. A Commercial Genius. No one will be able to buy or sell without his seal. “No

man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number

of his name” (Rev. 13:17).

e. A Military Genius. “I saw, and behold a white horse; and he that sat on him had a

bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer”

(Rev. 6:2). “Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” (Rev.


f. A Religious Genius. He demands to be worshiped as God. “Who opposeth and

exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God

sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God” (II Thess. 2:4).

g. A Financial Genius. “He shall have power over the treasures of gold and silver,

and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at

his steps” (Dan. 11:43). See also Ezekiel 28:4,5.

B. His Titles.

1. Man of Sin. This is the most important and most terrible of all his titles. All the sins

of man will be embodied and headed up in him. “Let no man deceive you by any means:

for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be

revealed, the son of perdition” (II Thess. 2:3).

2. Son of Perdition. The above Scripture declares him to be the son of perdition, also

(II Thess. 2:3).

3. The Lawless One. “Then shall that Wicked [lawless one] be revealed, whom the

Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of

his coming” (II Thess. 2:8). Christ is the righteous one; the Antichrist is the lawless one.

4. The Lie. “God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a [the] lie”

(II Thess. 2:11). Jesus Christ is the Truth; the Antichrist is the Lie. John 8:44 says that the

Devil is a liar “and the father of it.” “It” refers to “the lie.”


5. The Antichrist. “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that

antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is

the last time” (I John 2:18).

6. King of Babylon. Babylon is always the seat of Satan. Babylon shall be revived in

the last days, and the Antichrist shall reign over it (Rev. 17 and 18).

7. The Little Horn. “Out of one of them came forth a little horn which waxed

exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land. . .

And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a

king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up” (Dan. 8:9,

23). See also Daniel 7:8.

8. The Willful King. “The king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt

himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against

the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is

determined shall be done” (Dan. 11:36).

9. The Assyrian. “O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine

indignation” (Is. 10:5). See also Isaiah 10:12, 24.

10. The Beast. (Rev. 13, 17, 19).

C. His Forerunners.

Some are seen in the Scriptures, and some out of the Scriptures.

1. Cain. He denied the blood and was a liar and murderer (I John 3:12).

2. Nimrod. His history preceded the calling of Abraham to the Promised Land. The

Antichrist will precede the call of the seed of Abraham and enter into the Promised Land

the second time. Nimrod means “rebel,” While the Scriptures speak of him as being a

mighty hunter, in reality he was not a hunter of animals, but a hunter of souls. He was “a

mighty man against the Lord.” So the Antichrist will be.

3. Saul. This king of Israel was demanded by the people, but he was against the

anointed of the Lord. The Antichrist will be the choice of the people also, and he will be

against God’s anointed.

4. Absalom. Absalom means “father of peace”; yet he denied his father. He posed as a

man of peace and tried to steal the kingdom. So will the Antichrist.



1. A Man of Beauty 1. The same.

2. Tried to gain the kingdom by flatteries. 2. The same.

3. Set up a pillar to himself. 3. The same.

4. Came to a violent end. 4. The same.

5. Nebuchadnezzar. He was the first world ruler, who became the forerunner of the

last world ruler.

6. Antiochus Epiphanes. He was the mad man who sacked Jerusalem, killing four

hundred thousand Jews. He took a sow and burned it upon the altar. The Antichrist, too,

shall profane the altar.

7. Alexander the Great. He was known as the “Unsatisfier.” He was a military genius

who never suffered defeat. He sought to be worshiped as the Son of God. The same will

be true of the Antichrist.

8. Caias Caligula. This Roman Emperor was considered mad. No doubt he was

possessed by a demon. The Antichrist shall be fully possessed by the Devil.

9. Nero. During his life he was thought to be the Antichrist by the early Christians.

Many believed that when he died he would be raised from the dead. The Antichrist shall

be raised from the dead.

10. Charlemagne. This man was considered a great warrior and statesman. The

Antichrist shall he considered the same.

11. Napoleon. He thought to revive the Holy Roman Empire. This figurative empire is

considered to comprise those countries whose lands are washed by the waters of the

Mediterranean Sea. Napoleon planned a new Jewish kingdom and Sanhedrin. The

Antichrist will accomplish many of these same plans.

12. Kaiser Wilhelm. This leader of the German Empire had the same objective as

Napoleon. It is said that every general carried a map of the Holy Roman Empire.

13. Mussolini. There were no doubts as to the objectives of this man. At one time he

made a map of the old Roman Empire and included England in it. England protested, but

the map remained. The Antichrist will not only make a map, but he will make a kingdom

with all empires in it.


D. His Work.

His work shall be motivated by Satan, ruling the world and trying to destroy the Jew (Is.


F. His Career.

Remember, this is the mocker and mimic of Christ. He shall claim a reincarnation. His

birth shall be obscure; he will begin as a mere man in world affairs; but he will be rapidly

promoted until he becomes ruler of the entire world. Daniel 9:27 states that he will

confirm the covenant” with the Jews. “Confirm” means to “recognize.” What covenant

is Israel interested in? The Mosaic Covenant. For the first three and one-half years of the

Tribulation the Jews will be allowed to worship in their new temple. This would have

been hard to believe a hundred years ago, for then only a handful of Jews lived in

Palestine. But look at Israel today. She is recognized as a nation; she has a government,

an army, an air force; she is doing business with the rest of the world. There are literally

hundreds of thousands of Jews back in the land. Here is Israel as a nation; why do they so

exist? Is this the last regathering? Are they waiting for the Messiah? No. For the most

part, Israel has returned to the land in unbelief. They do not even believe the God of their

fathers, much less in their rejected Messiah. What, then, is Israel waiting for? She is

waiting for the rise of the Antichrist, although she knows it not. He is to confirm the

covenant. Therefore, there must be a nation with which the Antichrist can confirm the

covenant. Here is Israel waiting for the Antichrist.

I saw one of his heads as it was wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed:

and all the world wondered after the beast” (Rev. 13:3). According to this Scripture and

Revelation 17, we see that the Antichrist shall suffer death, that he shall die. The words

deadly wound” are better translated “death stroke.” Revelation 13:12 has the phrase,

whose deadly wound was healed,” which describes fully the death and resurrection of

the Antichrist. See also Revelation 13:14. No wonder the world will wonder after him

and say, “Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” (Rev. 13:4).

He shall be the seventh of seven kings who shall be world rulers. When he dies and is

resurrected he becomes the eighth ruler of the world. The world shall be divided into ten

kingdoms, overlorded by ten rulers, “These have one mind, and shall give their power

and strength unto the beast” (Rev. 17:13).

No doubt he comes to the ascendancy of world rule in the seventieth week of Daniel. He

demands to be worshiped as God at this time, and thus he marks the beginning of The

Day of the LORD.

F. His Time.

He has not yet been revealed, but it is possible in the light of present-day events, that

somewhere in the world he is alive today. He will not appear as the Antichrist until the

old Roman Empire is revived, composed of the ten-toed kingdom of Daniel 2 and the ten225

horned beast of Revelation 13 and 17. Another thing that must come to pass before he is

revealed is the Rapture of the Church.

G. His Appearance.

He shall be a Jew by birth, a Roman by citizenship, and a Syrian by nationality. “Out of

one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and

toward the east, and toward the pleasant land” (Dan. 8:9). He marches on to conquer the

nations of the south, and the east, and the west, He does not conquer the north, for that is

where he shall come from — Syria!

H. His End.

Then shall that lawless one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of

his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming” (II Thess. 2:8). See also

Revelation 19:20.


There are three distinct tribulations in the Scriptures, and unless they are distinguished

from each other, confusion will result. While the Word says that the Body of Christ is

enduring tribulation, it also says that Israel shall have tribulation. Then there shall be

three and one-half years of great tribulation, such as the world has never seen. At this

point many get confused — by the combination of these three into one tribulation. They

are distinctly separate, however. First, there is the Tribulation of the Church, which is for

the Body of Christ and is now present. Second, there is the Tribulation known as Jacob’s

Trouble, which lasts seven years and is future. Finally, there is the Great Tribulation,

which commences in the midst of Jacob’s Trouble and lasts for three and one-half years.

The first Tribulation is for the Church and is brought about by Satan. The second

Tribulation is upon Israel and is brought by God. The Great Tribulation is pronounced

upon Israel and the world and is brought by God through Satan.

A. The Tribulation of the Body of Christ.

There is no denying that the Church is enduring tribulation. “For verily, when we were

with you, we told you before that we should suffer tribulation; even as it came to pass,

and ye know” (I Thess. 3:4). “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer

persecution” (II Tim. 3:12). It is the nature of the Church to suffer. The world lieth in the

hands of the wicked one; we being of heavenly origin, are bound to be persecuted by

Satan and his cohorts. The Church is a Body; as it is natural for it to suffer, one member

may be suffering while the others are not; yet, one member cannot be hurt without the

entire body suffering.

Paul, in speaking to the Colossians, said, “[I] now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and

fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body’s sake,

which is the church” (Col. 1:24). Notice that the word “afflictions” is the Greek word


thlipsis, meaning tribulation. This is the same word that is used of the Tribulation and the

Great Tribulation. Also, we call attention to the words “afflictions of Christ”: the definite

article should appear before “Christ,” making it read “the afflictions of the Christ.” Thus,

it is the Tribulation of the Christ, or the Body of Christ, the Church. As it is natural for

the Body to suffer, and as the Colossians were not suffering, Paul had to make up for

what was lacking on the part of the Colossians. He so states in this verse. If this were not

so, how could he be suffering for the Colossians? He had never been there; he only knew

a few of the Christians there; he was in Rome, hundreds of miles away from them, How

could his suffering in Rome be effective for them in Colosse? The only answer is that he

had to make up for the lack of suffering on the part of the Colossians. In Colossians 1:13

Paul speaks of the Church as being the kingdom of God’s dear Son, and then in verse 24

he emphasizes its sufferings, or tribulation.

John states the same thing in Revelation 1:9 (R.V.): “I John, your brother and partaker in

the tribulation and kingdom and patience which are in Jesus, was in the isle that is called

Patmos, for the word of God and the testimony of Jesus.” Verily, the Church is enduring

tribulation — it is the Tribulation of the Christ.

B. The Tribulation of Israel.

A more familiar term is “Jacob’s Trouble.” “Alas! for that day is great. so that none is

like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble, but he shall be saved out of it” (Jer. 30:7).

This period lasts for seven years, and is known as the 70th week of Daniel. “Seventy

weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression,

and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in

everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most

Holy. Know, therefore, and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to

restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and

threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in

troublesome times. And after three score and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not

for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the

sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war

desolations are determined, And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week”

(Dan. 9:24-27).

By these verses we learn that seventy weeks, four hundred and ninety years, were

determined for Daniel’s people, the Jews. From the time that the command came to

rebuild Jerusalem to the time when Messiah (Christ) was cut off, was sixty-nine weeks,

or four hundred and eighty-three years. Between the sixty-ninth and seventieth week is a

gap, known as the Church Age, which Daniel knew nothing about, nor did any other Old

Testament prophets (Eph. 3:5). We know that these seventy weeks have to do with Israel

alone. The years during the Church period have, we must confess, been lean years for the

Jews. It seems that God has forsaken them, but He has not. After this Church Age is

completed, known as the “fulness of the Gentiles” (Rom. 11:25), the Church will be

raptured, and the Lord shall give full attention to the Jews (Israel) again. This will be the


seventieth week, known as the Tribulation, which lasts seven years.

The Church will not go through any part of this seven-year Tribulation. The fourth and

fifth chapters of Revelation fully describe the Rapture of the Church before the

Tribulation. Chapters six through nineteen then deal with the Tribulation. The Tribulation

is identified when the Antichrist confirms the covenant with the Jews. It is concluded

with the revelation of Christ in judgment.

C. The Great Tribulation.

While it is still Jacob’s Trouble, judgment shall be intensified the last three and one-half

years of the Tribulation. It is marked by the breaking of the covenant by the Antichrist,

and by the revelation of the Antichrist as the Lie. “In the midst of the week he shall cause

the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the over-spreading of abominations he

shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured

upon the desolate” (Dan. 9:27). The Lord Jesus re-emphasized this truth when He added

some details to the above quoted Scripture: “When ye therefore shall see the abomination

of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth,

let him understand:) then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains. . . . For then

shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time,

no, nor ever shall be” (Matt. 24:15, 16, 21). From the words of Daniel and the Lord Jesus

we learn that in the middle of the Tribulation the Antichrist breaks his covenant with the

Jews, causes the revived sacrificial rites to come to an end, and places himself in the holy

place, which is described as the abomination of desolation. II Thessalonians 2:4 describes

this event in added detail: the Antichrist “opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is

called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing

himself that he is God.”

During this last three and one-half years, when the Antichrist shall demand to be

worshiped as God, man will not be able to buy or sell without his mark (Rev. 13:17).

Many times the question is asked, “Will anyone be saved during the Tribulation

(including the Great Tribulation)?” Yes, people will be saved, even during the first three

and one-half years of the Tribulation. The departure of the saints will convince many

unbelievers of the truth of the Gospel; however, these believers will not be part of the

Body of Christ. Some may question these statements by using the following verses:

Then shall that lawless one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of

his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: even him, whose coming

is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all

deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love

of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong

delusion, that they should believe a [the] lie: that they all might be damned who believe

not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (II Thess. 2:8-12).

The above verses seem to teach that if one has rejected Christ before the Rapture he will

not be able to be saved during the Tribulation. But we call attention to the fact that God


causes them to believe the Lie, and they will not be able to believe the Lie until the

middle of the Tribulation period, as the Antichrist will not be revealed, as such, until

then. Therefore, we are led to believe that the invitation will still be given men to be

saved during the first three and one-half years of the Tribulation. But if they reject Christ

during this time, God shall give them strong delusions to believe the Lie, and it will be

impossible for them to be saved during the last three and one-half years of the


The natural question then arises, “Will anyone be saved during the last three and one-half

years?” Revelation 7 declares emphatically that there shall be countless numbers of Jews

and Gentiles saved during this period, known as the Great Tribulation. Those saved

during the Great Tribulation will be those who have never heard the Gospel and have not

taken the mark of the beast. Their salvation will be brought about by the preaching of a

great evangelistic movement, which will be composed, we believe, of the 144,000

Israelites (Rev. 7:4-8).

You may ask, “How, then, will it be possible for them to be saved when the Holy Spirit

has been taken up out of the world?” Let us turn to Moffatt’s translation and read: “For

the secret force of lawlessness is at work already; only, it cannot be revealed till he who

at present restrains it is removed” (II Thess. 2:7). The Holy Spirit will not be taken up out

of the earth, but will take His restraining hand off sinful man and give him up fully to his

sin. The Holy Spirit will still be here, for He is omnipresent. He will not manifest himself

during the Great Tribulation as He did before the dispensation of grace. Again we remind

you that the Great Tribulation ends with the coming of Christ to this earth.


Whenever a great battle is fought, people fear that it is the Battle of Armageddon. In

order clearly to understand this battle, let us find out first what it is not, and then what it


A. What It Is Not.

1. It Is Not World Wars I and II.

2. It Is Not the First Battle of Gog and Magog. This battle is composed of the forces of

the Northern confederacy (Russia and her allies). It is not much of a battle, but God rains

fire and brimstone upon the armies and country. This occurs at the beginning of the


3. It Is Not the War in Heaven. This battle is described in Revelation 12:7-17. It

concerns the forces of Satan being defeated by Michael and his army.

4. It Is Not the Second Battle of Gog and Magog. This is the concluding battle of all

battles, whether physical or spiritual. It is fought after the Millennium, when Satan is

loosed for a season and deceives the Gentile peoples (Rev. 20:7-9). Fire comes down


from heaven and destroys them.

B. What It Is.

1. The Participants. I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies,

gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army”

(Rev. 19:19). This is the seed of the serpent fighting against the Seed of the woman (Gen.

3:15). It is the conflict between Christ and the Antichrist.

2. The Place. The plain of Esdraelon is the place of this battle. It is an ancient

battleground. Gideon fought there; Saul and Jonathan were killed there; Josiah was killed

by Pharaoh there; the Greeks and Romans battled there; and Napoleon suffered his first

defeat there.

3. The Time. The battle occurs at the end of the Great Tribulation, just before the

Millennium begins.

4. The End. The end of this battle results in the complete annihilation of the

Antichrist’s army. The Antichrist and the False Prophet are then cast alive into Hell. “The

beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with

which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that

worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with

brimstone” (Rev. 19:20).


The Millennium is the thousand-year reign of Christ immediately following the Great

Tribulation. Millennium is not a Scriptural word, but it is a Scriptural truth.

A. The Fact of the Millennium.

1. The Lord Has Decreed It (Ps. 2).

2. Christ Taught It (Matt. 24; Mark 13; Luke 21).

3. The Scriptures Teach It (Is. 2, 11).

4. The Psalmist Described It (Ps. 72).

5. The Angels Declared It (Luke 1).

6. The Transfiguration Pictures It (Matt. 16:28; 17:1).

7. A Gospel Outlines It (Mark 6:45-56).

8. The Apostles Preached It (Acts 2, 3).


9. Nature Longs For It. (Rom. 8).

B. The Description of the Millennium.

1. The Thousand Years (Rev. 21:1-7).

2. The Age to Come (Eph. 1:21).

3. The Day of the LORD (Rev. 6:12-17; Joel 2:10, 11,30, 31; Hag. 2:6,7; Matt. 24;

Zech. 14:1-5).

4. In That Day (Is. 4:2; 2:11, 17, 20, 21; 11:11).

5. The Restitution of All Things. “(The Lord] shall send Jesus Christ. . . . whom the

heavens must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken

by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began” (Acts 3:20, 21). Some use

this verse as meaning the restitution of Christ-rejecting sinners, and even the Devil. But

notice that the above verse says, “which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy

prophets.” The prophets say nothing of the restitution of the Devil and sinners.

a. Israel to the Promised Land (Is. 11:10-12).

b. Repentance of the Nations to Jehovah (Zech. 12: 10-14).

c. The Removal of the Band of Iniquity (Zech. 3:9).

d. Restoration of Rain (Joel 2:23-29).

e. Re-engraving of Jehovah’s Law (Jer. 31:28-37).

f. Redistribution of the Land (Ezek. 48).

g. Reconstruction of Jerusalem (Is. 62; Ezek. 40).

h. Restitution From Bondage of Fear (Is. 14:1-3; Jer. 33:14-16).

i. Restitution of Jehovah’s Love (Zeph. 3:16-20).

6. The Regeneration of All Things (Matt. 19:18; Is. 32).

7. The Falling Stone (Dan. 2).

C. The Types of the Millennium.

1. The Year of Jubilee (Lev. 25).

2. The Feast of Tabernacles (Lev. 23).

3. The Sabbath. It is that rest to come.

4. The Kingdom of Israel Under Solomon’s Reign. This was an absolute reign of


D. The Conditions During the Millennium.


1. The Church, It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him we also shall live

with him: if we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us”

(II Tim. 2:11, 12). Wherever the Lord shall be, there we shall be with Him (I Thess.

4:17). We shall reign, and we shall judge over angels and the world. I Corinthians 6:2, 3

says, “Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world. . . . Know ye not that we shall

judge angels?”

2. Satan. Satan shall be sealed and bound for a thousand years (Rev. 20:1-7). The

Antichrist is cast into the lake of fire before that (Rev. 19:20).

3. Israel. She shall become the head of all nations again, and will not remain the tail as

she is today (Is. 2:1-4; 11:3, 4; 61:5; Zech. 8:23; Deut. 28:13).

4. The Nations of the World. All nations will have to come up to Jerusalem year by

year and worship Jehovah there. If they do not keep the yearly Feast of Tabernacles, God

will cause no rain to fall upon that nation (Zech. 14:16; Is. 2).

5. Mankind.

a. Spiritual Condition. Some have been led to think that there will be no sin during

the Millennium, but there will be. Human nature has never changed from one

dispensation to another. There will be universal adoration of Christ (Heb. 8:11; 2:14;

Phil. 2:10, 11), but it will be feigned obedience upon the part of many. For example,

many in prison obey their warden, not because they love him, but because they must.

Where will these sinners come from, as the Millennium begins with only born-again

believers? They will be born of saved parents who came out of the Tribulation alive.

b. Physical Condition. Human life will be lengthened. Some will be able to live

throughout the Millennium. There shall be death during this reign of Christ, also —

death, not to the believer, but to the unbeliever. No babes or children shall die. When the

sinner becomes one hundred years old and still rejects Christ, he shall be cut off by death.

There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his

days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years

old shall be accursed [cut off]” (Is. 65:20).

c. Moral Condition. This will not be a period of absolute perfection. However, sin

will not be allowed to raise its head. Christ shall rule with a rod of iron (Ps. 46:9; Is. 2:4).

Sin, nevertheless, will be committed in the hearts of men.

6. Creation.

a. Physical. When Adam fell, the earth was cursed (Rom. 8:18-23). Man has

accomplished wonders with his irrigation systems, and the like, but look what God will

do! “The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall

rejoice and blossom as the rose” (Is. 35:1). See also Isaiah 55:13. Creation shall be

restored completely; no more earthquakes; no more storms, famines and pestilences (Joel


b. Animal Creation. Before man sinned, God had put the fear of man in the animals.

They ate the grass of the fields. During the Millennium they shall revert back to the same


order which He had intended for them (Is. 11:6-9). “And a little child shall lead them”

(Is. 11:6) means that a child, during the Millennium, shall literally lead animals around. It

is not speaking about children leading sinners to the Lord.


The Bible does not teach a general judgment. Instead, it informs us that there are many

judgments, some past, some present and some future. For example, there is the past

judgment upon Sodom and there is the future judgment upon Babylon.

A. Judgments of the Christian.

1. Judgment on Sin. When did this occur? For the Christian this is a past judgment, for

all of our sins were judged at Calvary. “Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for

the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by

the Spirit” (I Peter 3:18). “Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree,

that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were

healed” (I Peter 2:24). See also Galatians 3:13; John 3:16; Isaiah 53:5,6.

2. Judgment on Christian Service. No Christian will have to be judged for his sins;

they have already been judged upon the Cross of Calvary. The Christian will have to

answer to God for his works. “We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that

everyone may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done,

whether it be good or bad” (II Cor. 5:10). Yes, the Christian has escaped the future

judgment of the wicked (“Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth my word, and

believeth on him that sent me hath eternal life, and cometh not into judgment, but hath

passed out of death into life” —John 5:24, R.V.), but he shall stand before the judgment

seat of Christ to receive rewards for the deeds done in the body. The words, “judgment

seat,” are from the Greek word “Bema,” better translated “Rewarding Stand.” This will

be set up when Christ comes. “Behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give

every man according as his work shall be” (Rev. 22:12).

There are several crowns that the Christian may achieve:

a. The Crown of Life. “Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is

tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love

him” (Jas. 1:12). See also Revelation 2:10. This is rewarded for faithfulness, even unto


b. An Incorruptible Crown. “Every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in

all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible” (I Cor.

9:25). This is a reward for those who live separated lives unto the Lord.

c. Crown of Rejoicing. “What is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not

even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?” (I Thess. 2: 19). This is

the soul-winner’s crown.

d. Crown of Glory. “Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight

thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; neither

as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock. And when the chief

Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away” (I Peter


5:2-4). This is the shepherds’, pastors’, or ministers’ reward.

e. Crown of Righteousness. “There is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which

the Lord, the righteous judge shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all

them also that love his appearing.” This crown goes to all who love His second coming.

If you love His appearing, you will talk about it. All doctrines are headed up by the

Second Coming.

B. Judgment of the Nations.

This takes place at the beginning of the Millennium, the thousand year reign (Matt.

25:31-46). A better name for “nations” is “Gentiles.” This is the judgment of all Gentiles

who come out of the Tribulation alive. There are three classes of people mentioned:

sheep, goats and brethren. The brethren are the Jews; the sheep are the righteous; and the

goats are the unrighteous.

The righteous (sheep, Gentiles) go into the kingdom, then on to eternal life. The

unrighteous (goats, Gentiles) are sent immediately to the lake of fire; therefore, they will

not be judged at the Great White Throne. They go there a thousand years sooner than the

wicked dead.

There are those who contend that this is a judgment of works and that men go to heaven

or hell on the basis of their works; for, they say, the Scriptures state that this judgment is

based upon the words “inasmuch as ye have done it, or inasmuch as ye did it not.”

However, we will show that it is still a judgment based upon faith. The Lord, here, is the

judge, and He does mete out judgment on the basis of the words “inasmuch as . . . But let

us ask, What prompted the sheep nations to minister to the brethren, the Jews, during the

Tribulation? They did it because they accepted the brethren’s preaching. Do you think

that they would have visited, clothed, fed and ministered to the brethren during the

Tribulation if they had not believed? Remember, the Tribulation is going to be a time of

peril. Man will not be able to buy or sell without the mark of the beast. The sheep

(Gentiles) defy this order, reject the mark of the beast, and accept what the brethren

preach. We know they accept Christ, for the Lord has said, “He that receiveth you

receiveth me” (Matt. 10:40). Again we emphasize that the sheep (Gentiles) are saved

because of their faith in Christ, for Revelation 7:14 declares it so: “He said to me, These

are they which came out of great tribulation [the Great Tribulation], and have washed

their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.”

The unrighteous nations (goats, Gentiles) are cast into hell because of their unbelief.

They rejected the brethren, thus rejecting Christ.

C. Judgment at the Great White Throne.

This great judgment is found in Revelation 20:11-15: “I saw a great white throne, and

him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was

found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the

books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead


were judged out of those things which were written in the books according to their

works.” It is the judgment only of the wicked dead who have been raised at the last

resurrection. No born-again believer shall appear here. The wicked dead are not to be

tried as to whether they are going to heaven or hell; it has already been determined that

they are going to hell, for they died condemned (John 3:18). This judgment is to

determine the degrees of punishment, “according to their works” (Rev. 20:13).

There are two witnesses against them: The Book, and the Books; that is, the Book of

Life, and the Book of Works. We do not know what the different degrees of punishment

will be.


When the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall

go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog,

to gather them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they

went up on the breath of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the

beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them” (Rev.


This is the war that ends all war. It is the final conflict of the universe.

A. Satan Loosed.

As he is loosed for a short time, he tries one more thrust at God.

B. Nations Gathered.

We ask ourselves, Who could Satan organize among the Gentiles to fight against God?

None other but those unsaved who are ninety-nine years old and younger, who have been

born during the last century of the Millennium.

Notice that no army has gathered against them.

C. Army Destroyed.

Fire comes down from heaven and destroys them.

D. Satan Doomed.

He is then cast into the lake of fire prepared for him and his angels.


It is not hard to think of everlasting life, but it is hard to think of an eternity in hell;

nevertheless, it is true.


A. The Scriptural Teaching.

1. There Will Be a Day of Judgment (Acts 17:30, 31).

2. Every Man Will Be Judged for His Works (Rom. 2:16; Rev. 20:12).

3. It Is Eternal (Mark 9:43-48). See also Matt. 13.

4. There Will Be Degrees of Punishment (Rev. 20:12; Rom. 2:5, 6).

5. There Will Be a Resurrection of the Unjust As Well As of the Just (John 5:29).

6. Language Describes It (Matt. 25:46; Mark 9:45-48; John 3:36).

7. All Is Based Upon the Character of God as Righteous.

B. The Terms Used.

The following are the places where wicked human beings and angels are, or shall be sent


1. Sheol. This is the Old Testament word describing the place of the departed wicked.

2. Hades. This is the New Testament Greek word, describing the immediate state of

the wicked dead; it is the same as Sheol. There is nothing in the Bible that speaks of an

eternal Hades, or Sheol.

3. Tartarus. This is the place where the wicked angels are chained; it is a place of


4. Gehenna. Gehenna was the city dump outside of Jerusalem, whose fire never went

out. The Lord Himself likened hell unto it, describing the fires of hell that shall always

burn: “Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched” (Mark 9:44).

5. Tophet. “Tophet” is the Old Testament Hebrew word meaning the same as


6. Abyss. This is the place of fallen angels, human beings are never placed here (Rom.


7. Lake of Fire. This is found only in the Book of the Revelation. Its meaning is the

same as Gehenna.

8. Eternal. Sometimes this word is translated “everlasting.” The meaning is the same.

The punishment of the wicked is eternal.


a. First Interpretation. Thayer translates it to mean “without beginning and without


b. Second Interpretation. This states that “eternal” means “without beginning.”

c. Third Interpretation. This holds that “eternal” means “without ending.” We agree

with all three. We do not hold to the interpretation that it means only “age lasting.” Some

would have us believe that the wicked will endure hell for just an age. But the word

eternal” describing hell is the same word which describes eternal life (John 3:16), and

the everlasting God (Rom. 16:26), and the everlasting kingdom of Jesus Christ (II Peter


C. The Theories Proposed.

1. Universalism. This is the belief that all will finally be saved, including the Devil.

What would the words “judge” and “judgments” mean if they did not mean judge or

judgment. When God speaks about eternal judgment, He means eternal judgment (Acts

3:21-24; I Cor. 15:22; Matt. 18:9; John 3:36).

2. Conditionalism. This false teaching was not found in the Early Church, but it first

made its appearance in the nineteenth century. It was reasoned that eternal life is based

upon the acceptance of Jesus Christ. If one accepts Him, he has eternal life. If he does not

accept Him, he will never live; non-acceptance in this life will result in non-existence in

the future life. There is no Scriptural foundation for this theory.

3. Everlasting Punishment. This is based upon Biblical truth, which connects sin with

punishment. All sins committed are committed against eternity. He who sins by rejecting

Jesus Christ shall endure eternal punishment.


The Scriptures teach that there are three heavens:

A. First Heaven. This is the region of the clouds where the birds fly, the atmospheric


B. Second Heaven. This is the stellar heaven, where the stars are located.

C. Third Heaven. This is the place where God lives; it is the place where Jesus came


The Lord Jesus went through the first and second heaven to get to the third heaven.

Having then a great high priest, who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of

God, let us hold fast our confession” (Heb. 4:14, R.V.).

Heaven is just as real as the clouds and stars. It is the place where Stephen saw God; the

place to which John was caught up by the Spirit. The first thing he saw, was the Lord

Jesus. He is the heart of heaven (Rev. 1, Heb. 9:24). Paul, too, was caught up to the third


heaven (II Cor. 12:2). Where is heaven? Does the Bible make it clear? Heaven is always

in the north. “He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth

upon nothing” (Job 26:7). See also Isaiah 14:12-14; Psalm 82:1; 48:2.

Is heaven foursquare? Is it a cube? What will man have for his future home? Will it be a

small cubby hole in a square city? Is heaven only fifteen hundred miles square? While the

new Jerusalem (Rev. 21,22) is foursquare, this is only a city of heaven, which descends

as a present for the Bride.

Those who go there will live in perfect peace and perfect love for all time and eternity.

Ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly

Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels” (Heb. 12:22).12

Critique of other Systematic Theology Eschatology Works

A systematic theology is more than a doctrines book. It needs to systematically review other belief systems and theology works.

Critique of John Miley’s 1892 Methodist Eschatology

John Miley (1813-1895), a Methodist, published his Systematic Theology in 1892.

Critique of Charles Hodge’s 1878 Eschatology

Critique of Augustus Strong’s 1907 Eschatology

Critique of Theisens’ 1949 Eschatology

Critique of Chafer’s 1948 Eschatology

Critique of Chafer’s Volume IV Ecclesiology and Eschatology Introduction

A review of Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer’s Ecclesiology and Eschatology in Volume IV of his Systematic Theology must begin with a review and documentation of his three most critical and systematic flaws. His whole Systematic Theology is seriously flawed in its organization, in its doctrines, and in it communication. Dr. Chafer’s Ecclesiology is profoundly effected by all these shortcomings, but his Eschatology represents, at least, baby steps away from the flawed doctrine of Protestants, their Reformed Theology, and John Calvin’s Covenant Theology.

Dr. Chafer has a very verbose and conglomerated communication method. His work is laden with run-on passive voice sentences. His commentary drones on for pages without significant content, and it takes careful scrutiny to discern his main point. This may be a purposeful style. Pleasing 70 + denominations at Dallas Theological Seminary is easier when some of them do not know exactly what you are saying. It is not, however, a competent way to write a systematic theology.

The doctrines of Dr. Chafer must be drawn out of his verbose commentary. As was stated in critique of his volume on Soteriology, it is easier to draw doctrine out of the Holy Bible than to draw it out of Chafer’s voluminous effort. It is doubtless more accurate to do so as well. Again, trying to capture a doctrine agreed to by 70+ denominations is an undue challenge. None the less, this critique will address his doctrines on Ecclesiology and Eschatology, especially as they differ from Bible Doctrine.

The most profound flaw in Dr. Chafer’s Systematic Theology is his lacking organization and lack of a system in what he considers systematic. This profoundly effects each volume and each doctrine of his work. Here, in Volume 4 of his work, this lack annuls his presentation of a Biblical Ecclesiology and a Biblical, dispensational, premillennial Eschatology.

When one sets out to write a Systematic Theology they must organize every revealed doctrine in the Holy Bible. To some extent every man is a theologian because he organizes, in some fashion, what he knows about God. In that organization he distinguishes which parts he believes. Hopefully that is done consciously. Making such organization systematic entails a considerable effort and focused purpose. To do a systematic analysis each substantial part of a system is partitioned and isolated into a separate subsystem which is carefully defined and understood. Then all the systems are analyzed in concert to understand the larger system.

In a Systematic Theology, in a volume on Ecclesiology and Eschatology, those topics would be partitioned and isolated and therein carefully and Biblically defined. Dr. Chafer’s Volume IV has none of that.

A Critique of Dr. Chafer’s Ecclesiology

Dr. Chafer’s Ecclesiology section begins with his attempt to divide angels from Gentiles and Jews from Christians. This snafu occurred because Dr. Chafer wants to hold on to John Calvin’s election of Christians, but reject John’s Covenant Theology where Elect Christians replace God’s Elect Nation, Israel. Calvin brought into Reformed Theology this old Roman Catholic Replacement Theology. Dr. Chafer is intent on advancing Dispensational Theology, but refuses to disbar, or deny, or even define its archenemy Covenant Theology. This dilemma results in a volume on Ecclesiology intent on differentiating between Jew and Christian and Gentile. This is very awkward and not normally a concern of Ecclesiology at all.

Chafer’s Systematic Error

Chafer’s Volume IV of Systematic Theology contains 250 pages of his Ecclesiology, and 190 pages of his Eschatology but it includes much material not related to either topic at all. Such inexcusable organization is the result of both an overall poor organizing practice and an inadequate definition of a Systematic Theology in general. Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer contends that a Systematic theology is “The collecting, systematically arranging, comparing, exhibiting, and defending of all facts concerning God and His works from any and every source.”13 This author stated previous that in making such a brash definition Chafer unwittingly puts philosophers such as Aristotle and Plato, and Roman Catholics such as Saint Augustine and Saint Aquinas, and Protestants who persecuted Baptist, men such as Martin Luther and John Calvin, on equal grounds with Holy Scripture. In writing his seven or eight volumes on Systematic Theology he repeatedly makes this blunder.

A Systematic Theology is not to be an unabridged rendition of everything ever believed about God, as Chafer has boasted. It is to be a systematic organization of each truth that God has revealed in his inerrant, infallible record. Truths that are then given systematic analysis wherein they can debunk the theoretical conjectures of previous philosophers and theologians.

In his fourth volume Dr. Chafer needs both a strong organization of the truth about the Church, the Church age, and the end times and then a relentless attack of the Reformed Theologian’s Covenant Theology, Replacement Theology, and Catholicness of the Church. Chafer’s lacking organization and discipline make such a success unachievable. Chafer’s unsystematic system and flawed organization of material brings about a very flawed doctrine. A flawed doctrine which it conceals in exaggerated verboseness.

Previous theologies have been built as if theology were a science. Dr. Chafer falls into the same trap. A scientific method starts with a hypothesis which it twists and refines with experiment until it holds enough merit to advance to a theory. Theologians have considered theories reliable enough to place in their science based systematic theologies. In the scientific method, after a theory receives more extensive testing and refinement, it becomes a law. As an engineer this author loves and respects the scientific method. Kepler used it expertly to derive the laws of planetary motion. As a theologian this author insists that the scientific method has no place in deriving the “Thus saith the LORD” kind of truth which a true theologian is looking for.

Pilot asked Jesus “What is Truth?” In my statistics class I taught that truth is discovered by four primary means, only one has proven reliable. Philosophy says “I think therefore I am.” In their field one thinks, reasons, deduces and believes, expecting he has therein discovered truth. Then, in the turn of the last century scientists formalized the scientific method, and used it in founding natural laws operating in our universe. In this method a hypothesis is tested, refined, and observed into a theory, which is tested, refined, and observed into a natural law. Leading theologians pounced on this, and considered theology as the chief of the sciences. They filled their Systematic Theology books with theories that they documented into laws expecting that they had discovered the truths about God. But science is only an able tool to lead and surmise the truth about natural laws, not supernatural laws.

Statistics had an ugly beginning. It had trouble overcoming its nemesis, “Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.” The surveys and studies, the analysis and presentation of averages and standard deviations could surely lead to truth. But consider how statisticians and politicians readily misleads people into some grandiose untruths. In statistics a majority believing something is supposed to derive the truth. Know that philosophy and science do the same misleading. For philosophy rationally comprehending something makes it a personal truth. One need only mention Christian Science founder Mary Baker Glover Eddy’s idea that this world is only in the mind to alert the dangers of philosophy. Now we have come to where science has elevated the spontaneous generation of life to a teachable truth, and even teach as truth the insane idea that “survival of the fittest” had changed beagle dogs into Clydesdale horses, and lizards into bald eagles. Thus science-so-called14 cannot discern the truth. Ergo these forms of discriminating truth have their notable flaws.

The forth method of discerning truth is the “Thus saith the LORD” method. This is not the religious method. Indeed religions source of their truth is generally some ugly combination of the previous three mentions. Even in Dr. Chafer’s Systematic Theology this “Thus saith the LORD” method to often takes a back seat to religion and survey. One would expect that a section on Ecclesiology would begin with God’s notable definition of the Church and its formation. Instead Dr. Chafer first philosophizes about angels, Jews, Gentiles and Christians. He then gives the scientific method a spin and presents theories that have been advanced. Chafer then presents a statistical survey of who believes what. Organizing theology systematically requires that a baseline of truth be established up front. That base line must proceed with a “Thus saith the LORD” as its sole source. All other methods are fraught with blunder. Dr. Chafer’s eight volumes make up example “A” in that blundering.

Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer has purposed to “collect and systematically arrange, compare, exhibit and defend all facts concerning God and his works from any and every source.” Systematically such an approach is theological malpractice. To be Biblical and Systematic there must be a sole source. His lack of organizing thoughts and direction is serious, but his total miss-organizing the “system” in systematic, coupled with his strong reliance on extra Biblical sources make this volume, and his previous three, inexcusable.

It is reiterated here that Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer, founder of Dallas Theological Seminary in 1924, does not use the sharpest language and does not expose the error of the 70+ denomination that he is pandering to. He is the epitome of neoevangelicalism as herein defined.

A Critique of Dr. Chafer’s Eschatology

If there was an area where Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer’s premillennial, dispensational position could over power Reformed Theology’s shortcomings, it would be in his Eschatology. The Covenant Theology of John Calvin, the Presbyterian Church , and the Roman Catholic Church, could finally take its proper position in the theological trash can. The Replacement Theology of the Roman Catholic Church, the Presbyterian Church and John Calvin, could finally hold its justified label of Apostasy15 Alas, however, it has already been shown that Dr. Chafer is, in his heart, leaning into neoevangelicalism and not truly a militant Fundamentalist. Otherwise he would engage in rebuke, reproof, and separation from the certain apostasy found in these theologies, and more particularly the Presbyterian Church which he targeted for correction, instead of reproof.

Dr. Chafer does cite the total ignorance of Protestant Theologians where Biblical prophecy is involved. Without calling it gross, he points to the negligence of Dr. Charles Hodge, Dr. B.B. Warfield, and Dr. R.L. Dabney.16 The root cause of the gross negligence of these protestant theologians when it comes to Bible prophecy, is their subtle acceptance of the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrine of Replacement Theology and John Calvin’s doctrine of Covenant Theology. It is subtle because in all their writings they never detail what John Calvin’s Covenant Theology is all about, and never, ever broach the grotesque error of Replacement Theology, which is wholly encapsulated in Covenant Theology. Albeit the Presbyterian Denomination, which was Chafer’s primary target, is by no means subtle in its acceptance of Calvin and rejection of premillennialism. These theologians “have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam, the son of Bosor, who loved the works of unrighteousness; But was rebuked for his iniquity; the dumb ass speaking with mans voice forbade the madness of the prophet.” (2Pet 2:15-16) Dr. Charles Hodge is an intellectual giant. Perhaps dwarfing Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer, and certainly dwarfing this author, even as much as Balaam’s ass was dwarfed by the prophet that rode him. But when a rebuke is in order the dumb should speak out. Dr. Chafer did not, at least he did not with enough force (militantism) to curb the 70+ denominations which frequent Dallas Theological Seminary.

Dr. Chafer attempted to champion the premillennial position in a Presbyterian Denomination which rejected it. Champions cannot tip-toe. His section on Eschatology, the doctrine of last things, tip-toes through seven important facts. 1. “The neglect of the prophetic Scriptures on the part of theologians is all but complete.”17 Implicit here is that Chafer is referencing Protestant, non-Baptist theologians. George Dollar cites a host of stalwarts of Fundamentalism, all of which are premillennial. Perhaps they fall short of Chafer’s definition or circle of theologians.

2. “It is a common practice with some theologians to brand chiliasm18 as a modern theory… Reformers did not restore all features of doctrine… they retained the Romish notion that the Church is the Kingdom, fulfilling the Davidic covenant, and appointed to conquer the world by bringing it under the authority of the church.”19 Although Chafer does not say it out loud, this is in the doctrine of Covenant Theology, and Replacement Theology. Both contest the literal 1,000 year millennial reign of Christ on the throne of David from the city of Jerusalem, on the hills of Zion, clearly referenced in Psalm chapter two. Any, and every denomination holds to some aspect of this error in its denominational control of churches. The error is wholly engulfed in John Calvin’s doctrine.

3. “What is declared in Scriptures respecting prophecy is as credible as those portions which are historical. The language is no more complex, nor is the truth any more veiled.” Also “(The prophetic message) is dependent upon language – simple terms known to all – for its conveyance… let the Bible’s simple prophetic terminology bear the message that it naturally conveys”20 Although Dr. Chafer, again, does not say it out loud, this is his argument against the Romish and Reformed use of the allegorical method. The mainstay of Covenant Theology, ergo Reformed Theology, is its use of the allegorical method of hermeneutics. Any denomination or religion, for that matter, which maintains a clergy class, does so on the premise that commoners, often called laity, are not equip to interpret the secret allegorical communiques of Scripture. Rome took this separation of their clergy so serious that laity caught reading or memorizing their Bibles were burned with their Bibles. Protestants only occasionally took this murderous tactic, but they endorsed all of the clergy class vs laity class principles, and promote it still today, even in Dallas Theological Seminary’s 70+ denominations.

4. “The Scripture presents but one system of truth… The word of God does not lend itself as support to postmillennial, amillennial,… schemes of interpretation.”21 This partial quote was extracted from Chafer’s verbose explanation which, perhaps, was meant to communicate that several competing interpretations cannot exist together. Elsewhere in his verbose effort, it is surmised that he holds to a premillennial position.

5. “No decrees of councils; no ordinances of synods; no ‘standard’ of doctrines; no creed or confession, is to be urged as authority in forming the opinions of men… What is based on the authority of apostles and prophets is true, and always true, and only true.”22 This would have been an excellent place for Dr. Chafer to emphasize the infallible, inerrant, plenary, verbally inspired Word of God, but, alas, he does not.

6. “The whole Bible is harmonized only by the (literal millennial reign of Christ for 1,000 year, with a premillennial second advent) interpretation.” Chafer continues, “(The Reformers) were Augustinian in their doctrine and gave no support to the idea of a millennium prior to the second advent.”23 Again, it was necessary to trim Chafer’s verbose mannerisms and detail what he meant to say for his Greek code word chiliasm.

7. There is no denomination which holds a premillennial doctrine. 24

With those seven truths delineated in his 1947 publication of Eschatology, my thesis that Dr. Chafer had more Neoevangelicalism in his heart than he had Fundamentalism in his heart needs to be reiterated. Such a thesis does have its crux in Chafer’s desire to move the denominations, particularly the Presbyterian denomination, to an acceptance of the Biblical premillennial position, and his failure to accomplish this desire.

Make no mistake, Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer was a fundamentalist. The song leader under C.I. Scofield became a gifted teacher for the newly formed World’s Christian Fundamentals Association (WCFA) and in 1924 his Evangelical Theological College became Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas, Texas, a fundamental seminary.25 Evangelicals became Neoevangelicals when they scoffed at the Fundamental Separatist position and refused the Fundamentalist’s militant attitude. Dr. Chafer never scoffed, but he never separated either. Dr. Chafer never mocked militantism, but he never became one, and he never camped with any.

Instead of rationalizing with these seven truths, Dr. Chafer could have very well rebuked and reproved. A reproof is in order when protestant/reformed theologians 1) reject Biblical prophecy, 2) reject premillennialism, 3) hold to Roman Catholic allegorical methods which elevate clergy in priestly garb, 4) advance amillennialism/postmillenialism, 5) reject the Bible as a sole inerrant infallible ssource, 6) reject the literal millennial reign of Christ on the thrown of David from the Hills of Zion, substituting the Catholic Church in its stead. and 7) advance their apostasy with denominational controls. That is Chafer’s list with bluntness and some measure of militantism.

One cannot say that had Dr. Chafer been a militant, separatist fundamental that he would have met more success. Protestants are no more likely to leave their reformed theology than any king was likely to leave “the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which made Israel to sin.”26 There is a time to “answer a fool according to his folly, (Prov 26:4-5) and Dr. Chafer did not step up to the plate. Instead he settled in among them, he waxed just as scholarly as they, and he became a middle-of-the-road bridge which could conduct exploring minds into their ranks. The bridge is a one-way street. If one is to get back out of Reformed Theology’s anti-whosoever will, anti-premillennialism, anti-Israel stance, Chafer’s bridge will not lead the way.

In its day, the GARBC27 was, for Baptists, as fundamental as one gets. Dallas Theological Seminary was not on their approved list of schools and the perpetual warning to students who would go there is telltale. “Students who go to Dallas Theological Seminary come out middle-of-the-road evangelicals, never to be Baptist again.”28 Their emphasis on “never” was so pronounced that a graduate of Dallas would “never” get a recommendation from GARBC when he candidated as a pastor. The GARBC used careful syntax to make sure they were perceived as an association, or fellowship, and not a denomination. However, their ability to excommunicate often made that distinction blurry, and they too, in time, fell into neoevangelicalism.

What can be said of Dr. Chafer’s Eschatology can be said of all seven volumes of his Systematic Theology. He uses three tactics to tip-toe around in the apostasy where he finds himself encamped. He attempts to generalize and detail each theory and belief of all men from every source. This warms him to his apostate audience, and displays a scholarly flare. He then enters into a tirade of verbiage, using passive sentence structures and run on sentences. This allows that none in his audience really understands all he is saying, but their favorite beliefs are in there somewhere, so they keep reading. This is really an aged tactic of intimidation, and Dr. Chafer uses it with great subtlety. Lastly, Chafer presents his truth as a gentle correction.

The difference between teaching and preaching, is in the level of the pressure for required change; teaching has none, preaching forces one to the very brink of a decision. Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer was an exceptional teacher. But the protestant denominations do not need mixers, they need separators, they do not need smooth teachers, they need militant preachers. Although Dr. Chafer was listed as a fundamentalist, he was not a separator or a militant. That is a reasonable assessment of all seven volumes.

From Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer Systematic Theology, Volume 4, pages 390-401

  1. Noah’s prediction respecting his sons: Genesis 9:25-27.
  2. Israel’s bondage in Egypt: Genesis 15:13-14.
  3. The future of Jacob’s sons: Genesis 49:10, 24.
  4. Israel in the land: Deuteronomy 4:14-20; 31:14-23; Genesis 15:13-14.
  5. Israel’s captivities:
    1. Egyptian bondage: Genesis 15:13-14;
    2. Assyrian and Babylonian captivities: Jeremiah 25:11-12;
    3. Final scattering among the nations: Deut. 28:63-68 (many cross-references).
  6. Judgments to fall upon surrounding nations:
    1. Babylon: Isaiah 13:1-22; 14:18-27; Jeremiah 50:1-51:64;
    2. Moab: Isaiah 15:1-9; 16:1-14; Jeremiah 48:1-47;
    3. Damascas: Isaiah 18:1-14; Jeremiah 49:23-27;
    4. Egypt: Isaiah 19:1-25; Jeremiah 46:2-28;
    5. Tyre: Isaiah 23:1-18; Jeremiah 47:1-7;
    6. Ammon: Jeremiah 49:1-6;
    7. Edom: Jeremiah 49:7-22;
    8. Elam: Jeremiah 49:34-39.
  7. A partial restoration: Isaiah 44:28; Jeremiah 25:11-12; Daniel 9:2.
  8. The coming and ministry of John the Baptist: Isaiah 40:3-5; Malachi 4:5-6; Luke 1:5-25.
  9. The birth of Christ: (extensive number not listed here) Genesis 3:15; Isaiah 7:14; 9:6; Luke 1:31-35.
  10. The offices of Christ:
    1. Prophet: Deuteronomy 18:15-19 (many cross-references);
    2. Priest: Psalm 110:4; Zechariah 6:12-13; much of Hebrews;
    3. King: 2 Samuel 7:16; Psalm 2:6-10; 72:1-19; Isaiah 9:6-7; Zechariah 9:9; Matthew 21:1-9; 27:11; Luke 1:32-33.
  11. The ministries of Christ: Isaiah 49:1-7; 61:1-3.
  12. The death of Christ:
    1. Directly predicted: Psalm 22:1-21; Isaiah 52:13—53:12;
    2. Prophesied by Christ Himself: Matthew 16:21; Mark 8:31; Luke 9:22; 18:31-34; John 12:32-33.
  13. The burial of Christ: (important part of the gospel: 1 Corinthians 15:1-4; and in the sanctification of the believer: Romans 6:1-10) Isaiah 53:9; Matthew 27:57-60.
  14. The resurrection of Christ: Leviticus 14:4 ff.; Psalm 16:8-11 with Acts 2:25-31; Psalm 22:22 with Hebrews 2:12; Psalm 118:22-24 with Acts 4:10-11. Christ’s own expectation is also recorded: Matthew 12:38-40; 16:21; 17:9, 23; 27:63; Mark 8:31; 9:9; 10:34; 14:58; Luke 9:22; 18:33; John 2:19-22.
  15. The ascension of Christ: John 20:17 with Psalm 24. Leviticus 23:9-12 as type.
  16. The present age: Matthew 13; Matthew 24:4-8; Galatians 1:4; 2 Timothy 4:10.
  17. The day of Pentecost: Leviticus 23:15-21 type.
  18. The Church: Matthew 16:18.
  19. The destruction of Jerusalem: Luke 21:20-24 with Matthew 24:2; Mark 13:1-2.
  20. The last days for the Church: (not the last days for Israel, Acts 2:17) 1 Timothy 4:1-3; 2 Timothy 3:1-5; James 5:1-10; 2 Peter 2:1 ff.; Jude 1:1-25; Revelation 3:14-22.
  21. The first resurrection: 1 Corinthians 15:20-24; John 5:25-29; Revelation 20:4-6. (Note the three diverse resurrections and the timing of each: Christ, believers, unbelievers.)
  22. The rapture of living saints: 1 Corinthians 15:35-57 (35-50 is about believers who have died). (Many cross references.)
  23. The Church in heaven: Revelation 4:1 ff.
  24. The believer’s rewards: 1 Corinthians 3:12-15; 9:16-27; 2 Corinthians 5:9-11; Revelation 3:11; 22:12.
  25. The marriage of the Lamb: Revelation 19:7-9
  26. The great tribulation per se: Deuteronomy 4:29-30; Psalm 2:5; Jeremiah 30:4-7; Daniel 12:1; Matthew 24:9-28; 2 Thessalonians 2:8-12; Revelation 3:10; 7:13-14; 11:1—19:6.
  27. The appearing of the Man of Sin: Ezekiel 18:1-10; Daniel 7:8; 9:27; 11:36-45; Matthew 24:15; John 5:43; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12; Revelation 6:2; 13:1-9; 19:19-20; 20:10.
  28. Israel’s final sufferings: Deuteronomy 28:63-68; Jeremiah 30:4-7; Matthew 24:21-27.
  29. The destruction of ecclesiastical Babylon: Revelation 17.
  30. The battle of Armageddon: Revelation 16:13-16; Zechariah 12:1-9; Isaiah 10:28-32; Matthew 24:29-30; Zechariah 14:2; Isaiah 63:1-6; 2:12; Daniel 2:35.
  31. The destruction of political and commercial Babylon: Revelation 18-19.
  32. The Day of the Lord per se: Matthew 24:42-44; 1 Thessalonians 5:4; 2 Peter 3:10.
  33. The second coming of Christ per se: Revelation 19:11-16; Ezekiel 20:33-44; Isaiah 63:1, 4; Romans 11:26-27.
  34. Satan bound and confined: Revelation 20.
  35. The regathering and judgment of sorrowing Israel: Deuteronomy 30:1-8; Isaiah 11:11-2; Jeremiah 23:7-8; Ezekiel 37:21-28; Matthew 23:37; 24:31.
  36. The judgment of the nations: Matthew 24:37—25:46 with Genesis 12:1-3; Joel 3:2-16; Psalm 96:13; 98:9.
  37. Human life in the earthly kingdom: Psalm 72:1-19; Isaiah 11:1-10, 14:1-2; 60:12; 61:5; Jeremiah 31:31-33; Matthew 5:1—7:29; 25:34; Romans 8:18-23.
  38. The loosing of Satan and the last revolt: Revelation 20.
  39. The doom of Satan: Revelation 20:10.
  40. The passing of the present earth and heaven: Isaiah 65:17; 66:22; Hebrews 1:10-12; 2 Peter 3:3-13; Revelation 20:11; 21:1
  41. The Great White Throne judgment: Revelation 20:12-15; 21:8; 22:10-15.
  42. The destiny of the wicked: Revelation 20:14-15.
  43. The creation of a new heaven and a new earth: (see #40).
  44. The destiny of the saved: \
    1. New earth: Revelation 21:3-4; Isaiah 66:22;
    2. New heavens: Hebrews 12:22-24; Revelation 21:9-22:7; John 14:1-3.
    3. The day of God: 2 Peter 3:12 with 1 Corinthians 15:28.

      Only major events have been included in this listing. Unnumbered lesser events all of them themes of prediction—should have their full and worthy consideration.

Critique of Geisler’s 2002 Eschatology

Penny Pulpit Essays on Eschatology.

Msg #1342 Prophetic Truth and Accuracy

What The Bible Says

Good Samaritan’s Penny Pulpit by Pastor Ed Rice

For us it is a minor thing to comprehend how two witnesses slain in the streets of Jerusalem are seen all over the world for three days. For Martin Luther and other Protestant Reformers it was so incomprehensible that they thought the Revelation of Jesus Christ and its companion book, Daniel, were not inspired or belonging in the Bible, at best calling them allegorical, apocalyptic fiction. Protestants believed so little of these books they carried Roman Covenant Theology right into their reformation where it presently leavens as Reformed Theology. For the Bible believer, however, these books are true and accurate. Daniel has six chapters of history and six chapters of Biblical Prophecy. The first six teach us how to accurately read the last six. The interpretation of Neb’s dream, and its exact unfolding in history reveals that the Stone Cut Out without hands, which smashes all previous kingdoms into chaff, is indeed the Christ who will come as King of kings and Lord of lords to a battle called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon. He is the Ancient of Days, with hair like pure wool, and he is the Son of man come with the clouds of heaven to the Ancient of Days. All power is given to him. Likewise, in the literal, grammatical, historical understanding there is a little horn which, in separate visions, replaces three of ten, and comes out of one of four. It waxes great, has eyes of a man, speaks great things, and desecrates the daily sacrifice in the Temple at Jerusalem. He casts down hosts of heaven and is called the King of Fierce Countenance. He persecutes the Woman, Israel for 3 ½ years of a seven year tribulation. Jesus calls him the Abomination of Desolation. I’d sooner believe Jesus than a Reformed Theologian.

An Essay for week #42 Sun, Oct 20, 13

In paperback at

Msg #1440 Don’t Be Left Behind

What The Bible Says

Good Samaritan’s Penny Pulpit by Pastor Ed Rice

There is coming a Last October. “In the seventh month, in the first day of the month, shall ye have a sabbath, a memorial of blowing of trumpets, an holy convocation… Also on the tenth day of this seventh month there shall be a day of atonement: …and ye shall afflict your souls, and offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD… The fifteenth day of this seventh month shall be the feast of tabernacles…” (Lev23:23-24,27,34). Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and the Feast of Tabernacles mark the important fall memorial of blowing of trumpets. Bible believing Christians are listening for the trumpet symbolized in this feast. It will be a voice “as it were of a trumpet, talking with me; which said, Come up hither” (Rev 4:1). “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible” (1Cor 15:52). “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and (we) shall be caught up… to meet the Lord in the air” (1Thes 4:16-17). This is the rapture of the Church, and one must here distinguish between Bible believers and the Bible allegorizers. The Roman Religionists taught their reformers to allegorize away Jews and the premillennial return of Christ. Consequently Protestants do not perceive the rapture in these verses, and the Reformed cannot conceptualize our Christ on the Throne of David, in Jerusalem, for a 1,000 year dispensation. The truths in the 2nd advent of Christ are reserved for those with ears to hear, and eyes that don’t allegorize. Bible believers often “stand gazing up into heaven” (Acts 1:8-11). A “Hunt for the Last October” begins, don’t be left behind.

An Essay for week #40 10/05/2014

In paperback at

Msg in audio at

Part 2 in audio at

Msg #1441 The 7 Year Tribulation is not Allegorical!

What The Bible Says

Good Samaritan’s Penny Pulpit by Pastor Ed Rice

The seventieth week of Daniel marks a seven year period where Jesus tells us, “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor even shall be” (Matt 24:21). Roman and Reformed Theologians try to allegorize the reality of a premillennial advent and a literal seven year tribulation period into disbelief, but when Christ divides the seven years in half, seven distinct times, their false teachings come unraveled. A Hebrew calendar has twelve, thirty day months, and they add an extra month in seven years. Daniel 12 divides the seven year tribulation into 1260 days and then 1290 days, calling them time, times, and half a time. The times of the Gentiles in Revelation 11 is forty-two months, or half the tribulation period. The two indestructible witnesses in Jerusalem prophecy for 1,260 days before Satan destroys them and God tells them, “Come up hither.” (Rev 11:3-12) After the seven seals and the seven trumpets, halfway through the tribulation, and exactly halfway through the 404 verses of Revelation, Satan is booted from heaven and torments the earth, knowing his time is short. The persecuted Israel is fed in the wilderness for 1,260 days of Satan’s vile persecution. The commercial Babylon is fallen is fallen, halfway through the 7 year period. And Mystery Babylon, the false church and Jezebel is devoured and destroyed by the Dragon, Beast, and False Prophet of the new world order. Mid-trib is a very busy time indeed, and the week of tribulation, the literal 7 years such as was not since the beginning of the world, is not an allegorical pretense, it is a Bible reality. You can only be saved from the wrath to come, by first calling on Christ, the soon coming judge.

An Essay for week #41 10/12/2014

In paperback at

Msg in audio at

A Systematic Theology for the 21st Century

Part 12 Epilogue


Bibliography for Theology

The Holy Bible

Bancroft, Emery H., Elemental Theology, 1932, Baptist Bible Seminary, 1945, 1960, Zondervan 1977, [In 1932 Emery H. Bancroft became the first Dean of Baptist Bible Seminary, Johnson City, NY and published his text for his course Elemental Theology. In 1968 the Seminary relocated to Clark Summit PA. In 1970 this author attended Practical Bible Training School on the Johnson City campus and studied Bancroft’s text. In 1999 – 2000 this author attended Baptist Bible Seminary to take Greek (NT502 and NT503) via a 3 hour commute from Hammondsport NY to Clark Summit PA, and was reintroduced to Bancroft’s exceptional work.]

Cambron, Mark G. Bible Doctrines. Grand Rapids, Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 1954, [Independent Baptist, Professor, Tennessee Temple Bible School, 1954].

Carroll, James Milton, The Trail of Blood, 1932, open source, public domain, from

Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Systematic Theology, Volume I Prolegomena and Bibliology , Volume II Angelology and Anthropology, Volume III Soteriology, Volume IV Ecclesiology and Eschatology, Volume V Christology, Volume VI Pneumatology, Volume VII Alphabetical Doctrinal Summarization, Volume VIII Biographical Sketch and Indexes, Dallas Seminary Press, 1948. [Lewis Sperry Chafer was an American theologian. He founded and served as the first president of Dallas Theological Seminary, and was an influential founding member of modern Christian Dispensationalism. Born: February 27, 1871, Rock Creek, Died: August 22, 1952, Seattle, Education: Oberlin College, Wheaton College. For my Doctorate of Philosophy in Theological Studies through LBTS, I was tasked to analyze all six volumes of his Systematic Theology]

Satan, 1909, Free ebooks – Project Gutenberg,2004, accessed 06/01/2013

Christian, John T., A History of the Baptists, Vol 1&2, The Baptist Bible Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana, first published in 1922, public domain, soft copy T. Christian/vol1/ or

Dollar, George W., A History of Fundamentalism in America, Bob Jones University Press, 1973.

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Baker Books, Grand Rapids, MI, 1985.

Finney, Charles G., Power from On High, Christian Literature Crusade, public domain, from

Gaussen, L., Theopneustia – The plenary Inspiration of The Holy Scriptures deduced from Internal Evidence, and the Testimonies of Nature, History and Science, David Scott’s translation, Chicago, The Bible Institute Colportage ASS’N., 1840.

Geisler, Norman L, Systematic Theology in One Volume, Bethany House, 2002, 3, 4, 5, 11 [Geisler, also a neoevangelical, sharply contrasts with Lewis Sperry Chafer in that Geisler 1) admits what he is, neoevangelical, 2) admits what he is attempting, a compilation of evangelical theologies, 3) shows superb organization and structure of thought, 4) contains depth, and 5) is a masterful communicator. This author cannot endorse all that Geisler believes to be true, but can endorse that he seems to capture all that has been believed by conservative evangelicals.]

Hodge, Charles, Systematic Theology: Volume I-IV, Charles Scribner & Company, 1871, Hardback- Grand Rapids, Mich., Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1940, Christian Classics Ethereal Library,, public domain. [The Internet Archive], [Charles Hodge, 1797-1878, Presbyterian Minister, Princeton Theologian].

Larkin, Clarence. The Spirit World, Published by the Clarence Larkin Estate, 1921, Cosimo, 2005

Miley, John, Systematic Theology Vol. 1 & 2, The Library of Biblical and Theological Literature, New York: Eaton and Mains, 1894, The Internet Archive, [John Miley (1813-1895, Methodist Theologian].

Rice, Edward G., The 357 Magnum Errors of the Modernist’s Critical Texts, Public Domain,,

Ryrie, Charles C., Basic Theology. Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1981.

Schaff, Philip. The Creeds of Christendom. Three volumes, 1877, reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1977.

———-. History of the Christian Church. Third edition, revised in eight volumes, Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1910.

Schofield, C. I., Prophecy Made Plain, Photolithoprinted by Grand Rapids Book Manufacturers, Grand Rapids, MI, 1967.

Shedd, William G. T., Dogmatic Theology, Roosevelt Professor of Systematic Theology in Union Theological Seminary, New York, Charles Scribner & Sons, 1888. [The Internet Archive], [William G.T. Shedd, 1820-1894, Old School Presbyterian & Reformed Theologian].

———-. Calvinism: Pure and Mixed, A Defense of the Westminster Standards. 1893, reprint, Edinburgh, UK: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1986.

———-. Commentary on Romans. 1879, reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1980.

Strong, Augustus H., Systematic Theology:Three Volumes in 1, Philadelphia, Valley Forge PA, The Judson Press, 1907, 35th printing 1993. [Augustus H. Strong, 1836-1921, American Baptist Pastor & Theologian].

Thiessen, Henry Clarence, Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Mich., William B. Eerdman Publishing Company, 1949. [Henry Clarence Thiessen, ? -1947, President of Los Angles Baptist Theological Seminary, later renamed John MacArthur’s The Master’s College].

Lectures in Systematic Theology. Revised by Vernon D. Doerksen, Grand Rapids, Mich., William B. Eerdman Publishing Company, 2006.

Waite, D.A.. Defending the King James Bible, The Bible For Today Press, 1992 & 2002.

Yoho, Walter Allan, YAHWEH The Greatness of God, Volume 1 thru 3,, 2010. [Dr. Yoho teaches theology at Tabernacle Baptist Theological Seminary 717 Whitehurst Landing Rd. Virginia Beach VA 23464 under Pastor. James Baker. We met after our military-hop to Norfolk VA on our return from Mazara Del Vallo, Italy in May 2016. I have been enthralled with his three volumes of theology since that meeting.]

1 ology is from the Greek meaning a word, a discourse, a doctrine, a teaching, a matter under discussion, a thing spoken of or talked about, also the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, or reasoning about Others have limited this suffix by equating it to the English word science, which is “The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.” There really is no English equivalent that can capture the depth of ology, it is literally to go on, and on, and on about a topic with pen, or speech, or thought.

2 De 29:4, Eze 12:2, Mt 11:15 13:9,43, Mr 4:9,23 7:16, Lu 8:8 14:35, Re 2:7, 11, 17, 29 3:6, 13, 22, 13:9

3 Recall that true Christianity has no clergy, or laity, or Nicolaitans, cf Rev 2:6, 15.

4Michael J. Vlach, “VARIOUS FORMS OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY”, TMSJ 20/1 (Spring 2009) 57-69, (accessed 10/29.2016) . [Michael J. Vlach is a Ph.D. and Assistant Professor of Theology at Dr. John MacArthur’s Masters Seminary. The neo-evangelical positions of Masters Seminary do not represent the views of this author.]

5 James Showers, “Facts and Flaws of Covenant Theology”, from The Friends of Israel. Website: E-mail: Toll free: 1-800-257-7843, (accessed 9/9/2016). [James A. Showers is executive director for The Friends of Israel.]

6 From a message “How To Destroy the Jews!” by George Zeller, Middleton Bible Church, 349 East Street, Middletown, CT 06457 as published in Volume 36, Number 4, July Aug 2005

7 Rev 20:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

8Dr. Mark G. Cambron, B.A., M.A., Th.B., Th.M., Th.D., D.D., L.L.D., Litt.D., was one of the foremost theologians of our times. Born in Fayetteville, Tennessee on July 31, 1911. He was born-again in 1919. It was during a Billy Sunday campaign in Chattanooga that he trusted in the Lord Jesus Christ as his personal Savior. He served for many years at Tennessee Temple College (1948-59) with Dr. Lee Roberson and served as Dean of the College. From accessed 10/16/2013

9Mark G. Cambron, Bible Doctrines, 1954, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 60-69

10The Cambron Institute, 35890 Maplegrove Road, Willoughby, Oh 44094

11It is noted and reproved in the Bibliology section of this work that Dr. Cambron’s Bible Doctrines book recommends using the R.V., instead of the Holy Bible, 41 times for 54 Bible verses.

12Mark G. Cambron, Bible Doctrines, 1954, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 249-288

13from book promotion paragraph quoting Dr. Chafer’s promotion of his “Systematic Theology” accessed Dec 2013

14 1Ti 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: s.f. Apostasy The ancient criminal offense of heresy or non-belief in religion. (Herein used that definition includes non-belief in the inerrant, infallible, plenary, verbally inspired Holy Bible, rather than non-belief in mere religion.)

16Chafer, Systematic Theology, Volume IV, 255-256

17Ibid., 255

18Chafer uses this Greek word Chiliasm, Greek for 1,000, to soft shoe the brazen literalness of a millennial reign of Christ, a millennial reign which is preceded by his 2nd Advent, i.e. premillennialism.

19Ibid., 257

20Ibid., 258 and 259

21Ibid., 261

22Ibid., 262

23Ibid.267 and 278

24Ibid., 282-283

25Dollar, A History of Fundamentalism in America, 160

261Ki 14:16, 15:26, 15:34, 16:13, 16:26, 21:22, 22:52, 2Ki 3:3, 10:29, 10:31, 13:2, 14:24, 15:9, 15:18, 15:24, 15:28, 23:15

27General Association of Regular Baptist Churches

28Multiple sources from my childhood.